Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34563094›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of investigation in health, psychology and education2021

Mathematics Classroom Assessment: A Framework for Designing Assessment Tasks and Interpreting Students' Responses.

Eleni Demosthenous, Constantinos Christou, Demetra Pitta-Pantazi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Introduction to the Special Issue on Recent Advances in Mathematics Education.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eleni DemosthenousDepartment of Education, University of Cyprus, 1 Panepistimiou Avenue, 2109 Aglantzia, Nicosia, P.O. Box 20537, Nicosia 1678, Cyprus.
Constantinos ChristouDepartment of Education, University of Cyprus, 1 Panepistimiou Avenue, 2109 Aglantzia, Nicosia, P.O. Box 20537, Nicosia 1678, Cyprus.
Demetra Pitta-PantaziDepartment of Education, University of Cyprus, 1 Panepistimiou Avenue, 2109 Aglantzia, Nicosia, P.O. Box 20537, Nicosia 1678, Cyprus.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Classroom assessment could contribute substantially to improving students' mathematics learning. The process of classroom assessment involves decisions about how to elicit evidence, how to interpret it, and how to use it for teaching and learning. However, the field still needs to further explore how assessment tasks could guide forthcoming instructional adjustments in the mathematics classroom. Towards the endeavor of unpacking the classroom assessment, we present a framework that provides a lens to capture the interplay between the design of mathematics assessment tasks and the analysis of students' responses. To do so, we relied on existing frameworks of mathematics assessment tasks, and on issues that pertain to the design of tasks. The proposed framework consists of three types of mathematics assessment tasks, their respective competencies, and the characterization of students' responses. The framework is exemplified with students' responses from a fourth-grade classroom, and is also used to sketch different students' profiles. Issues regarding the interpretation of students' responses and the planning of instructional adjustments are discussed.

Indexed as

instructional adjustmentsmathematics classroom assessmentstudents’ profilestypes of mathematics tasks

Identifiers

PMID34563094
PMCPMC8544217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.