Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34563057›Full record

ReviewClocks & sleep2021

The Language of Dreams: Application of Linguistics-Based Approaches for the Automated Analysis of Dream Experiences.

Valentina Elce, Giacomo Handjaras, Giulio Bernardi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clocks & sleep, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. New strategies for the cognitive science of dreaming.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. The influence of intentions on dream content.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Valentina ElceMoMiLab Research Unit, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, 55100 Lucca, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7830-8177
Giacomo HandjarasMoMiLab Research Unit, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, 55100 Lucca, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5677-8434
Giulio BernardiMoMiLab Research Unit, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, 55100 Lucca, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4045-7075

Funding

European Research Council 948891Fundação Bial 091/2020International Brain Research Organization Early Career Award 2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of dreams represents a crucial intersection between philosophical, psychological, neuroscientific, and clinical interests. Importantly, one of the main sources of insight into dreaming activity are the (oral or written) reports provided by dreamers upon awakening from their sleep. Classically, two main types of information are commonly extracted from dream reports: structural and semantic, content-related information. Extracted structural information is typically limited to the simple count of words or sentences in a report. Instead, content analysis usually relies on quantitative scores assigned by two or more (blind) human operators through the use of predefined coding systems. Within this review, we will show that methods borrowed from the field of linguistic analysis, such as graph analysis, dictionary-based content analysis, and distributional semantics approaches, could be used to complement and, in many cases, replace classical measures and scales for the quantitative structural and semantic assessment of dream reports. Importantly, these methods allow the direct (operator-independent) extraction of quantitative information from language data, hence enabling a fully objective and reproducible analysis of conscious experiences occurring during human sleep. Most importantly, these approaches can be partially or fully automatized and may thus be easily applied to the analysis of large datasets.

Indexed as

dreaminggraph analysissemanticsword embedding

Identifiers

PMID34563057
PMCPMC8482230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.