Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34563054›Full record

ArticleClocks & sleep2021

The Effect of Bright Light Treatment on Rest-Activity Rhythms in People with Dementia: A 24-Week Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

Eirin Kolberg, Ståle Pallesen, Gunnhild Johnsen Hjetland, Inger Hilde Nordhus, Elisabeth Flo-Groeneboom

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clocks & sleep, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Eirin KolbergDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen (UiB), 5009 Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-6106-6447
Ståle PallesenDepartment of Psychosocial Science, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen (UiB), 5015 Bergen, Norway.
Gunnhild Johnsen HjetlandDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen (UiB), 5009 Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-3450-3186
Inger Hilde NordhusDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen (UiB), 5009 Bergen, Norway.
Elisabeth Flo-GroeneboomDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen (UiB), 5009 Bergen, Norway.
University of Bergen · NOUniversity of Oslo · NOVaal University of Technology · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bright light treatment is an effective way to influence circadian rhythms in healthy adults, but previous research with dementia patients has yielded mixed results. The present study presents a primary outcome of the DEM.LIGHT trial, a 24-week randomized controlled trial conducted at nursing homes in Bergen, Norway, investigating the effects of a bright light intervention. The intervention consisted of ceiling-mounted LED panels providing varying illuminance and correlated color temperature throughout the day, with a peak of 1000 lx, 6000 K between 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Activity was recorded using actigraphs at baseline and after 8, 16, and 24 weeks. Non-parametric indicators and extended cosine models were used to investigate rest-activity rhythms, and outcomes were analyzed with multi-level regression models. Sixty-one patients with severe dementia (median MMSE = 4) were included. After 16 weeks, the acrophase was advanced from baseline in the intervention group compared to the control group (B = -1.02, 95%; CI = -2.00, -0.05). There was no significant difference between the groups on any other rest-activity measures. When comparing parametric and non-parametric indicators of rest-activity rhythms, 25 out of 35 comparisons were significantly correlated. The present results indicate that ambient bright light treatment did not improve rest-activity rhythms for people with dementia.

Indexed as

actigraphybright light therapycircadian rhythmsclinical trialdementianursing homesrest–activity rhythms

Identifiers

PMID34563054
PMCPMC8482074
OpenAlexW3200041858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.