Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34562941›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Salomé de Sá Magalhães, Eli Keshavarz-Moore

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Applications of the Methylotrophic YeastJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Engineering Biology of Yeast for Advanced Biomanufacturing.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. From Yeast to Biotechnology.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  18. Applications of Biotechnology in Food and Agriculture: a Mini-Review.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India. Section B · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Salomé de Sá MagalhãesDepartment of Biochemical Engineering, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Eli Keshavarz-MooreDepartment of Biochemical Engineering, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/R013756/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccination is of paramount importance to global health. With the advent of the more recent pandemics, the urgency to expand the range has become even more evident. However, the potential limited availability and affordability of vaccines to resource low- and middle-income countries has created a need for solutions that will ensure cost-effective vaccine production methods for these countries.

Indexed as

expression platformsLMICsP. pastoris (Komagataella phaffii)vaccines

Identifiers

PMID34562941
PMCPMC8468848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.