Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34562810›Full record

ArticlePreventive veterinary medicine2021

A cross-sectional survey to establish Theileria parva prevalence and vector control at the wildlife-livestock interface, Northern Tanzania.

Fiona K Allan, Emmanuel Sindoya, Katherine E Adam, Mechtilda Byamungu, Rachel S Lea, Jennifer S Lord, Geofrey Mbata, Edith Paxton, Furaha Mramba, Stephen J Torr and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive veterinary medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Morbidity, mortality, and risk factors associated withVeterinary and animal science · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Inherited Tolerance in Cattle to the Apicomplexan ProtozoanFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Fiona K AllanRoslin Institute, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, United Kingdom. Electronic address: fionakallan@gmail.com.
Emmanuel SindoyaMinstry of Livestock and Fisheries, Serengeti District Livestock Office, Mugumu, Tanzania.
Katherine E AdamInnogen Institute, Science Technology and Innovation Studies; School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Old Surgeons' Hall, High School Yards, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Mechtilda ByamunguTanzania Veterinary Laboratory Agency, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Rachel S LeaDepartment of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Jennifer S LordDepartment of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Geofrey MbataVector and Vector-borne Diseases Research Institute, Tanga, Tanzania.
Edith PaxtonRoslin Institute, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, United Kingdom.
Furaha MrambaTanzania Veterinary Laboratory Agency, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Stephen J TorrDepartment of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
W Ivan MorrisonRoslin Institute, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, United Kingdom.
Ian HandelRoslin Institute, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, United Kingdom.
Liam J MorrisonRoslin Institute, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, United Kingdom.
Harriet K AutyInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health & Comparative Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom (Previously Epidemiology Research Unit, SRUC, Inverness, United Kingdom).
Roslin Institute · GBLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBTanzania National Parks · TZMinistry of Livestock and Fisheries · TZUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GBVector & Vector-Borne Diseases Research Institute · TZ

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L019035/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

East Coast fever (ECF) in cattle is caused by the protozoan parasite Theileria parva, transmitted by Rhipicephalus appendiculatus ticks. In cattle ECF is often fatal, causing annual losses >$500 million across its range. The African buffalo (Syncerus caffer) is the natural host for T. parva but the transmission dynamics between wild hosts and livestock are poorly understood. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of T. parva in cattle, in a 30 km zone adjacent to the Serengeti National Park, Tanzania where livestock and buffalo co-exist, and to ascertain how livestock keepers controlled ECF and other vector-borne diseases of cattle. A randomised cross-sectional cattle survey and questionnaire of vector control practices were conducted. Blood samples were collected from 770 cattle from 48 herds and analysed by PCR to establish T. parva prevalence. Half body tick counts were recorded on every animal. Farmers were interviewed (n = 120; including the blood sampled herds) using a standardised questionnaire to obtain data on vector control practices. Local workshops were held to discuss findings and validate results. Overall prevalence of T. parva in cattle was 5.07% (CI: 3.70-7.00%), with significantly higher prevalence in older animals. Although all farmers reported seeing ticks on their cattle, tick counts were very low with 78% cattle having none. Questionnaire analysis indicated significant acaricide use with 79% and 41% of farmers reporting spraying or dipping with cypermethrin-based insecticides, respectively. Some farmers reported very frequent spraying, as often as every four days. However, doses per animal were often insufficient. These data indicate high levels of acaricide use, which may be responsible for the low observed tick burdens and low ECF prevalence. This vector control is farmer-led and aimed at both tick- and tsetse-borne diseases of livestock. The levels of acaricide use raise concerns regarding sustainability; resistance development is a risk, particularly in ticks. Integrating vaccination as part of this community-based disease control may alleviate acaricide dependence, but increased understanding of the Theileria strains circulating in wildlife-livestock interface areas is required to establish the potential benefits of vaccination.

Indexed as

RhipicephalusTheileria parvaTick ControlAcaricidesAnimalsAnimals, WildCattleCross-Sectional StudiesLivestockPrevalenceTanzaniaTick InfestationsAcaricidesAcaricideEast Coast feverRhipicephalus appendiculatusTheileria parvaVectorWildlife-livestock interface

Identifiers

PMID34562810
PMCPMC8573586
OpenAlexW3200312059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.