Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34562776›Full record

ArticleAddictive behaviors2022

Co-use among confidants: An examination of polysubstance use and personal relationships in southeastern Nebraska.

G Robin Gauthier, Kelly Markowski, Jeffrey A Smith, Sela Harcey, Bergen Johnston

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addictive behaviors, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

G Robin GauthierDepartment of Sociology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, NE, USA; Rural Drug Addiction Research Center, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, NE, USA. Electronic address: ggauthier3@unl.edu.
Kelly MarkowskiDepartment of Sociology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, NE, USA; Rural Drug Addiction Research Center, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, NE, USA. Electronic address: kmarkowski2@unl.edu.
Jeffrey A SmithDepartment of Sociology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, NE, USA; Rural Drug Addiction Research Center, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, NE, USA. Electronic address: jsmith@unl.edu.
Sela HarceyDepartment of Sociology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, NE, USA; Rural Drug Addiction Research Center, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, NE, USA. Electronic address: sharcey@huskers.unl.edu.
Bergen JohnstonRural Drug Addiction Research Center, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, NE, USA. Electronic address: bergenjohnston@unl.edu.

Funding

Testing the Efficacy of Ibudilast to Attenuate Meth-seeking and Associated Synaptic Inflammation at the Synapse (TEAMS)P20GM130461 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI KIMBERLY A TYLER · 2019 to 2026
$20.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM130461
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between personal networks and polysubstance use among people who use drugs (PWUD) in a medium sized city in the Midwest. A large body of work has demonstrated that personal relationships have an ambivalent association with substance use. On the one hand, a supportive network is associated with safer drug use practices and dramatically improves the outlook for recovery. However, individuals whose personal networks are composed of co-drug use partners are more likely to engage in risky practices. We argue that this notion of "supportive" social contacts and "risky" social contacts is ultimately incomplete: risky behaviors are introduced and further developed in a social context, often with the people who provide emotional support. We argue that personal networks with more multiplex relationships (where co-drug use and confiding fuse) are harmful because they combine norms of trust and reciprocity with drug use. We use data from the Rural Health Cohort (RHC) study to test this idea. The sample consists of 120 adult PWUD in a medium sized city located in southeastern Nebraska who were recruited using respondent-driven sampling. Participants listed up to nine confidants and nine co-drug use partners, indicating any overlap between the two networks. Our results demonstrate that multiplex ties are as strongly associated with polysubstance use as simple co-drug use relationships. As the drug crisis has increasingly shifted to underserved populations outside large urban centers, this paper represents an important advance in our understanding of the current drug crisis.

Indexed as

Risk-TakingSubstance-Related DisordersAdultHumansNebraskaSocial EnvironmentSocial NetworkingMultiplexityPolysubstance useRisky behaviorsSocial networksSubstance co-useSubstance use

Identifiers

PMID34562776
PMCPMC8542383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.