Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34562614›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2021

Clinical Implications of a Targeted RNA-Sequencing Panel in the Detection of Gene Fusions in Solid Tumors.

Lulu Sun, Samantha N McNulty, Michael J Evenson, Xiaopei Zhu, Joshua A Robinson, Patrick R Mann, Eric J Duncavage, John D Pfeifer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lulu SunDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri. Electronic address: sunl@wustl.edu.
Samantha N McNultyDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Michael J EvensonDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Xiaopei ZhuDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Joshua A RobinsonDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Patrick R MannDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Eric J DuncavageDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
John D PfeiferDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri. Electronic address: jdpfeifer@wustl.edu.
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The detection of recurrent gene fusions can help confirm diagnoses in solid tumors, particularly when the morphology and staining are unusual or nonspecific, and can guide therapeutic decisions. Although fluorescence in situ hybridization and PCR are often used to identify fusions, the rearrangement must be suspected, with only a few prioritized probes run. It was hypothesized that the Illumina TruSight RNA Fusion Panel, which detects fusions of 507 genes and their partners, would uncover fusions with greater sensitivity than other approaches, leading to changes in diagnosis, prognosis, or therapy. Targeted RNA sequencing was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sarcoma and carcinoma cases in which fluorescence in situ hybridization, RT-PCR, or DNA-based sequencing was conducted during the diagnostic workup. Of the 153 cases, 138 (90%) were sequenced with adequate quality control metrics. A total of 101 of 138 (73%) cases were concordant by RNA sequencing and the prior test method. RNA sequencing identified an additional 30 cases (22%) with fusions that were not detected by conventional methods. In seven cases (5%), the additional fusion information provided by RNA sequencing would have altered diagnosis and management. A total of 19 novel fusion pairs (not previously described in the literature) were discovered (14%). Overall, the findings show that a targeted RNA-sequencing method can detect gene fusions in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens with high sensitivity.

Indexed as

Gene FusionCarcinomaHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceNeoplasmsSarcomaSequence Analysis, RNASoft Tissue Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID34562614
PMCPMC12179502
OpenAlexW3199054988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.