Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34562439›Full record

ArticlePhysiology & behavior2021

Predictive and motivational factors influencing anticipatory contrast: A comparison of contextual and gustatory predictors in food restricted and free-fed rats.

Jessica Hayes, Celia Garau, Giulia Chiacchierini, Gonzalo P Urcelay, James E McCutcheon, John Apergis-Schoute

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiology & behavior, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 82% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Jessica HayesDept. of Neuroscience, Psychology & Behaviour, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 9HN, United Kingdom.
Celia GarauDept. of Neuroscience, Psychology & Behaviour, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 9HN, United Kingdom.
Giulia ChiacchieriniDept. of Neuroscience, Psychology & Behaviour, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 9HN, United Kingdom; Genetics of Cognition laboratory, Neuroscience area, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genova, Italy.
Gonzalo P UrcelayDept. of Neuroscience, Psychology & Behaviour, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 9HN, United Kingdom; School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, United Kingdom.
James E McCutcheonDept. of Neuroscience, Psychology & Behaviour, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 9HN, United Kingdom; Dept. of Psychology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Huginbakken 32, 9037 Tromsø, Norway.
John Apergis-SchouteDept. of Neuroscience, Psychology & Behaviour, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 9HN, United Kingdom; Department of Biological and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: iea6@le.ac.uk.
University of Leicester · GBItalian Institute of Technology · ITUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 209023/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In anticipation of palatable food, rats can learn to restrict consumption of a less rewarding food type resulting in an increased consumption of the preferred food when it is made available. This construct is known as anticipatory negative contrast (ANC) and can help elucidate the processes that underlie binge-like behavior as well as self-control in rodent motivation models. In the current investigation we aimed to shed light on the ability of distinct predictors of a preferred food choice to generate contrast effects and the motivational processes that underlie this behavior. Using a novel set of rewarding solutions, we directly compared contextual and gustatory ANC predictors in both food restricted and free-fed Sprague-Dawley rats. Our results indicate that, despite being food restricted, rats are selective in their eating behavior and show strong contextually-driven ANC similar to free-fed animals. These differences mirrored changes in palatability for the less preferred solution across the different sessions as measured by lick microstructure analysis. In contrast to previous research, predictive cues in both food restricted and free-fed rats were sufficient for ANC to develop although flavor-driven ANC did not relate to a corresponding change in lick patterning. These differences in the lick microstructure between context- and flavor-driven ANC indicate that the motivational processes underlying ANC generated by the two predictor types are distinct. Moreover, an increase in premature port entries to the unavailable sipper - a second measure of ANC - in all groups reveals a direct influence of response competition on ANC development.

Indexed as

FoodMotivationAnimalsFeeding BehaviorFood PreferencesRatsRats, Sprague-Dawley

Identifiers

PMID34562439
PMCPMC8593211
OpenAlexW3204694631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.