Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34562430›Full record

ArticleActa tropica2022

A descriptive qualitative case study of the experiences, perceptions and attitudes of pregnant women on Unguja island, Zanzibar, towards antischistosomal treatment.

Eleanor De Rosa, Bobbie Person, Stefanie Knopp, Juma Muhsin, Jameelat Harriet Lyimo, Fatma Kabole, David Rollinson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta tropica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Eleanor De RosaNo affiliation. Electronic address: elliederosa@gmail.com.
Bobbie PersonConsultant of the Schistosomiasis Consortium for Operational Research and Evaluation, University of Georgia, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. Electronic address: bobbieperson@gmail.com.
Stefanie KnoppSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstrasse 57, 4051 Basel, Switzerland; University of Basel, Petersplatz 1, 4003 Basel, Switzerland. Electronic address: s.knopp@swisstph.ch.
Juma MuhsinNeglected Diseases Program, Ministry of Health, P.O. Box 236, Zanzibar Town, Unguja, United Republic of Tanzania. Electronic address: j_muhsin@yahoo.com.
Jameelat Harriet LyimoNeglected Diseases Program, Ministry of Health, P.O. Box 236, Zanzibar Town, Unguja, United Republic of Tanzania. Electronic address: jameelatlyimo90@gmail.com.
Fatma KaboleNeglected Diseases Program, Ministry of Health, P.O. Box 236, Zanzibar Town, Unguja, United Republic of Tanzania. Electronic address: fatmaepi@yahoo.co.uk.
David RollinsonWolfson Wellcome Biomedical Laboratories, Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom. Electronic address: david.rollinson@eliminateschisto.org.
Ministry of Health · SICherokee Nation · USMinistry of Health · TTNatural History Museum · GBSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute · CHUniversity of Georgia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many countries exclude pregnant and lactating women from mass drug administration (MDA) programmes with praziquantel against schistosomiasis due to historic safety concerns over drug use during gestation and breast feeding. More than 10 years of empirical evidence from the field and a growing body of dedicated research has prompted the World Health Organisation and schistosomiasis control initiatives to advocate the inclusion of this vulnerable group into MDA. This qualitative descriptive case study explored, over a five-week period, the subjective experiences, perceptions, opinions, and attitudes of pregnant women attending government supported clinics on Unguja island, United Republic of Tanzania, towards praziquantel use during pregnancy in MDA programmes. The aim of the study was to identify and determine how to overcome potential barriers to effective use of MDA medications during pregnancy. Additionally, it was to determine trusted communication channels for future messaging and discover behavioural and community opportunities to increase participation of pregnant women in future MDA efforts. A 60 min, semi-structured qualitative interview was undertaken with 25 pregnant women recruited from 4 health centres on Unguja along with testing for Schistosoma haematobium infection. Using a modified-grounded theory approach, narrative data were transcribed, coded and analysed using a thematic analysis of the emergent themes. Women reported that they rely on traditional home remedies to stay healthy during pregnancy. Influenced by their mothers, husbands and neighbours, women predominately made medication choices during pregnancy and breastfeeding based on what they heard at home. Most women had been excluded from government MDA programmes in the past due to pregnancy. Women valued healthcare services for antenatal education and pregnancy advice. Women reported they would trust and follow direction from healthcare providers about taking praziquantel during pregnancy. Antenatal clinics offer an excellent opportunity to educate and expand praziquantel treatment to this cohort. Efforts should be augmented with training for providers and behavioural education for the community as a whole and family members of pregnant women.

Indexed as

Pregnant PeopleSchistosomiasis haematobiaAttitudeFemaleHumansLactationPerceptionPregnancyQualitative ResearchTanzaniaControlEducationEliminationInterventionMass drug administrationPraziquantelPregnancyQualitative researchSchistosomiasisZanzibar

Identifiers

PMID34562430
PMCPMC8646856
OpenAlexW3199756051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.