Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34562384›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2021

The arbitrium system controls prophage induction.

Aisling Brady, Nuria Quiles-Puchalt, Francisca Gallego Del Sol, Sara Zamora-Caballero, Alonso Felipe-Ruíz, Jorge Val-Calvo, Wilfried J J Meijer, Alberto Marina, José R Penadés

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Revisiting the life cycle of temperate phages.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Prophage: agent provocateur?Archives of microbiology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Selfish, promiscuous and sometimes useful: how mobile genetic elements drive horizontal gene transfer in microbial populations.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Decisions, decisions….Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Aisling BradyInstitute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8TA, UK.
Nuria Quiles-PuchaltInstitute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8TA, UK.
Francisca Gallego Del SolInstituto de Biomedicina de Valencia (IBV-CSIC) and CIBER de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), 46010 Valencia, Spain.
Sara Zamora-CaballeroInstituto de Biomedicina de Valencia (IBV-CSIC) and CIBER de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), 46010 Valencia, Spain.
Alonso Felipe-RuízInstituto de Biomedicina de Valencia (IBV-CSIC) and CIBER de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), 46010 Valencia, Spain.
Jorge Val-CalvoCentro de Biología Molecular "Severo Ochoa" (CSIC-UAM), Universidad Autónoma, Madrid, Spain.
Wilfried J J MeijerCentro de Biología Molecular "Severo Ochoa" (CSIC-UAM), Universidad Autónoma, Madrid, Spain.
Alberto MarinaInstituto de Biomedicina de Valencia (IBV-CSIC) and CIBER de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), 46010 Valencia, Spain. Electronic address: amarina@ibv.csic.es.
José R PenadésInstitute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8TA, UK; MRC Centre for Molecular Bacteriology and Infection, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK. Electronic address: j.penades@imperial.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N002873/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/S003835/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/V002376/1Medical Research Council MR/S00940X/1Medical Research Council MR/S00940X/2Medical Research Council MR/V000772/1Wellcome Trust 201531/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Some Bacillus-infecting bacteriophages use a peptide-based communication system, termed arbitrium, to coordinate the lysis-lysogeny decision. In this system, the phage produces AimP peptide during the lytic cycle. Once internalized by the host cell, AimP binds to the transcription factor AimR, reducing aimX expression and promoting lysogeny. Although these systems are present in a variety of mobile genetic elements, their role in the phage life cycle has only been characterized in phage phi3T during phage infection. Here, using the B. subtilis SPβ prophage, we show that the arbitrium system is also required for normal prophage induction. Deletion of the aimP gene increased phage reproduction, although the aimR deletion significantly reduced the number of phage particles produced after prophage induction. Moreover, our results indicated that AimR is involved in a complex network of regulation and brought forward two new players in the SPβ lysis-lysogeny decision system, YopN and the phage repressor YopR. Importantly, these proteins are encoded in an operon, the function of which is conserved across all SPβ-like phages encoding the arbitrium system. Finally, we obtained mutant phages in the arbitrium system, which behaved almost identically to the wild-type (WT) phage, indicating that the arbitrium system is not essential in the laboratory but is likely beneficial for phage fitness in nature. In support of this, by possessing a functional arbitrium system, the SPβ phage can optimize production of infective particles while also preserving the number of cells that survive after prophage induction, a strategy that increases phage persistence in nature.

Indexed as

Bacillus PhagesBacteriophagesLysogenyPeptidesVirus ActivationPeptidesAimPAimRbacteriophagelysislysis/lysogenylysogenyphi3TrepressorSOS responseSPβ phages

Identifiers

PMID34562384
PMCPMC8612738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.