Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34562316›Full record

Observational studyClinical and experimental immunology2021

Intravenous immunoglobulin and the current risk of moderate and severe anaphylactic events, a cohort study.

Carlos Martinez, Christopher Wallenhorst, Sheryl van Nunen

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical and experimental immunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Using Biologics in the Prevention of Anaphylaxis.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2025
    Review
  3. Use of Immunoglobulin Replacement Therapy in Clinical Practice: A Review.Journal of immunotherapy and precision oncology · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carlos MartinezInstitute for Epidemiology, Statistics and Informatics GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany.
Christopher WallenhorstInstitute for Epidemiology, Statistics and Informatics GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany.
Sheryl van NunenNorthern Clinical School, Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
University of Sydney · AU

Funding

Part-funded by CSL Behring
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This large cohort study from the US Premier Healthcare Database evaluated the risk and predictors of anaphylaxis in association with intravenous immunoglobulin (IvIg) therapy in the inpatient and outpatient setting. Data were collected retrospectively (January 2009-December 2018) from 24 919 patients administered IgPro10 IvIg, median age 54 years. Immunoglobulins of interest were IgPro10 and other IvIg given before or after IgPro10. Moderate and severe anaphylaxis was identified from same-day parenteral epinephrine and IvIg use and reviews of patient record summaries. Predictors for first anaphylactic reactions associated with IvIg administration were derived from adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRR) using Poisson regression. Moderate anaphylaxis in IvIg use was rare and severe anaphylaxis very rare based on a total of 124 moderate and four non-fatal severe first anaphylactic events, incidence rate of 7.11 and 0.23/10 000 IvIg administrations, respectively. Age under 18 years was an independent predictor of moderate or severe anaphylactic events [adjusted incidence rate ratio = 2.94, 0.95 confidence interval  = 1.91-4.52] compared with those aged 18 years and older. First IvIg administration was a strong predictor of anaphylaxis. The IRR in those with a subsequent IvIg administration in the preceding 42 days decreased to 0.27 (0.17-0.42) and in those effectively IvIg-naive (no IvIg for > 42 days) to 0.76 (0.44-1.32) compared with first IvIg use. The key conclusions from this study are that the risk of anaphylaxis has progressively reduced over the last decade, from 14.87 of 10 000 in 2009-10 to 4.39 of 10 000 IvIg administrations in 2017-18 and is rare overall, and that the risk of anaphylaxis is increased in those aged under 18 years.

Indexed as

Adrenergic AgonistsAnaphylaxisEpinephrineFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulins, IntravenousIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRiskUrticariaAdrenergic AgonistsEpinephrineImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulins, Intravenousanaphylaxisincidence rateintravenous immunoglobulinspredictorsPremier Healthcare Database

Identifiers

PMID34562316
PMCPMC8561696
OpenAlexW3202677624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.