Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34562310›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2021

A framework to guide dose & regimen strategy for clinical drug development.

Oliver Sander, Baldur Magnusson, Inga Ludwig, Astrid Jullion, Christophe Meille, Daniel Lorand, Björn Bornkamp, Markus Hinder, Steven J Kovacs, Michael Looby

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A framework to guide dose & regimen strategy for clinical drug development.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Oliver SanderNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Baldur MagnussonNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Inga LudwigNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Astrid JullionNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Christophe MeilleNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Daniel LorandNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Björn BornkampNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Markus HinderTranslational Medicine, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Basel, Switzerland.
Steven J KovacsTranslational Medicine, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA.
Michael LoobyNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Novartis (Switzerland) · CHNovartis (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimizing new drug therapies remains a challenge for clinical development, despite the use of ever more sophisticated quantitative methodologies. Although conceptually simple, the idea of finding the right treatment at the right dose for the right patient to ensure an appropriate balance of risks and benefits is challenging and requires a multidisciplinary approach. In this paper, we present a framework developed as a tool for organizing knowledge and facilitating collaboration in development teams.

Indexed as

Drug DevelopmentHumans

Identifiers

PMID34562310
PMCPMC8592517
OpenAlexW3200868290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.