Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34562307›Full record

ArticleNursing open2022

Addressing current challenges in adult nursing: Describing a virtual Consensus development project methodology.

Bethany Taylor, Jane South, Steve Robertson, Tony Ryan, Emily Wood, Rachel Louise King, Michaela Senek, Angela Tod, Jane Seymour

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bethany TaylorDivision of Nursing & Midwifery, Department of Health Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4090-3047
Jane SouthSchool of Health & Community Studies, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
Steve RobertsonDivision of Nursing & Midwifery, Department of Health Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5683-363X
Tony RyanDivision of Nursing & Midwifery, Department of Health Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8549-3101
Emily WoodDivision of Nursing & Midwifery, Department of Health Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1910-6230
Rachel Louise KingDivision of Nursing & Midwifery, Department of Health Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4012-0202
Michaela SenekDivision of Nursing & Midwifery, Department of Health Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Angela TodDivision of Nursing & Midwifery, Department of Health Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Jane SeymourDivision of Nursing & Midwifery, Department of Health Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis article describes the development and implementation of a virtual Consensus development project to address current challenges in adult nursing care in the UK.

designThis is a Consensus Development Project (CDP).

methodsThe five stages of this CDP were: develop questions (informed by PPI representatives and a documentary review), generate evidence reviews, recruit and orient the lay panel, host Consensus seminars, and consult with panel members and stakeholders.

resultsTo the best of our knowledge, a CDP has not previously been conducted in a UK nursing context, and this is the first of its kind to be hosted virtually. This article contributes a detailed outline of the Consensus development methodology and constructive commentary to support future Consensus development projects. Learning points include reflections on the impact of hosting this event virtually, the relationship between the project coordinator and chair, and the composition of the lay panel.

Indexed as

Research PersonnelConsensusConsensus Statements as TopicHumansadult nursingConsensus methodologyUnited kingdom

Identifiers

PMID34562307
PMCPMC8859052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.