Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34562270›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2022

Clinical performance of methylation as a biomarker for cervical carcinoma in situ and cancer diagnosis: A worldwide study.

Cristiana Banila, Attila T Lorincz, Dorota Scibior-Bentkowska, Gary M Clifford, Birhanu Kumbi, Dereje Beyene, Cosette M Wheeler, Kate Cuschieri, Jack Cuzick, Belinda Nedjai

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Use of First-Void Urine to Screen Women Aged 60-79 for HPV in the UK: The Catch-Up Screen Study.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Cristiana BanilaCentre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3078-104X
Attila T LorinczCentre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7097-6223
Dorota Scibior-BentkowskaCentre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Gary M CliffordEarly Detection, Prevention and Infections Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7534-333X
Birhanu KumbiDepartment of Microbial, Cellular and Molecular Biology, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Dereje BeyeneDepartment of Microbial, Cellular and Molecular Biology, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Cosette M WheelerCentre for HPV Prevention, University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
Kate CuschieriScottish HPV Reference Laboratory, Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2604-3928
Jack CuzickCentre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7420-7512
Belinda NedjaiCentre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8711-4577
Queen Mary University of London · GBAddis Ababa University · ETCentre international de recherche sur le cancer · FRUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of New Mexico · US

Funding

The EPI-STI Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Core (Cuzick/Wheeler)U19AI113187 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI WHEELER, COSETTE MARIE · 2014 to 2018
$12.6M
Cancer Research UK 21070Cancer Research UK 27046Cancer Research UK C569/A10404/CRUKNIAID NIH HHS U19 AI113187World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The shift towards primary human papillomavirus (HPV)-based screening has necessitated the search for a secondary triage test that provides sufficient sensitivity to detect high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and cancer, but also brings an improved specificity to avoid unnecessary clinical work and colposcopy referrals. We evaluated the performance of the previously described DNA-methylation test (S5) in detecting CIN3 and cancers from diverse geographic settings in high-, medium- and low-income countries, using the cut-off of 0.80 and exploratory cut-offs of 2.62 and 3.70. Assays were performed using exfoliated cervical specimens (n = 808) and formalin-fixed biopsies (n = 166) from women diagnosed with cytology-negative results (n = 220), CIN3 (n = 204) and cancer stages I (n = 245), II (n = 249), III (n = 28) and IV (n = 22). Methylation increased proportionally with disease severity (Cuzick test for trend, P < .0001). S5 accurately separated women with negative-histology from CIN3 or cancer (P < .0001). At the 0.80 cut-off, 543/544 cancers were correctly identified as S5 positive (99.81%). At cut-off 3.70, S5 showed a sensitivity of 95.77% with improved specificity. The S5 odds ratios of women negative for cervical disease vs CIN3+ were significantly higher than for HPV16/18 genotyping at all cut-offs (all P < .0001). At S5 cut-off 0.80, 96.15% of consistently high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV)-negative cancers (tested with multiple hrHPV-genotyping assay) were positive by S5. These cancers may have been missed in current primary hrHPV-screening programmes. The S5 test can accurately detect CIN3 and malignancy irrespective of geographic context and setting. The test can be used as a screening and triage tool. Adjustment of the S5 cut-off can be performed considering the relative importance given to sensitivity vs specificity.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationAdultBiomarkers, TumorCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlobal HealthHuman papillomavirus 16Human papillomavirus 18HumansMiddle AgedPapillomavirus InfectionsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesUterine Cervical DysplasiaBiomarkers, Tumorcancer screeningcervical cancerDNA methylationhigh-risk human papillomavirusHPVmolecular triagetriage

Identifiers

PMID34562270
PMCPMC8627461
OpenAlexW3201373449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.