ArticleClinical and experimental dental research2022
The micro-shear bond strength of resin cements to aged laser bleached enamel after using different desensitizing agents.
Article in Clinical and experimental dental research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- AnJournal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran) · 2024Article
- The micro-shear bond strength of resin cements to aged laser bleached enamel after using different desensitizing agents.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the micro-shear bond strength of two resin cements to aged laser bleached enamel after the application of three different desensitizing agents. MATERIALS AND
methodsForty extracted human central and lateral incisors were prepared and bleached using laser activation bleaching protocol. The teeth were assigned randomly into four groups for desensitization; G1: No post-bleaching treatment, G2: GC MI Paste Plus, G3: Hydroxyapatite nanoparticles (n-HAP) and G4: Flor-Opal. Specimens were subjected to aging for 6 months. All groups were subdivided into two subgroups according to the resin cements used (dual-curing resin cement and light-curing resin cement).
resultsFlor-Opal groups showed the highest statistically significant micro-shear bond strength (MSBS), followed by GC MI Paste Plus and n-HAP groups with no statistically significant difference between them. The light-curing resin cement had statistically higher MSBS than dual-curing resin cement in case of no-post bleaching treatment and n-HAP groups, and no statistical difference in case of GC MI Paste Plus and Flor-Opal groups.
conclusionUsage of desensitizing agents containing, CPP-ACP, n-HAP or fluoride after laser bleaching can enhance the bond strength of the resin cements to enamel. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The composition of the desensitizing agents applied after laser bleaching could interfere in bond strength values.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.