Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34562021›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental medicine and child neurology2022

Inequities in quality and safety outcomes for hospitalized children with intellectual disability.

Laurel Mimmo, Reema Harrison, Joanne Travaglia, Nan Hu, Susan Woolfenden

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental medicine and child neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Co-Producing a Patient Reported Experience Measure (PREM) With and for People With Intellectual Disability.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Generators of Inequality and Inequity Affecting Dental Patient Safety: A Grounded Theory Approach.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laurel MimmoSchool of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7738-8275
Reema HarrisonHealth Management Programs, Faculty of Medicine, School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8609-9827
Joanne TravagliaFaculty of Health, Centre for Health Services Management, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7537-0466
Nan HuFaculty of Medicine, School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0516-0738
Susan WoolfendenFaculty of Medicine, School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6954-5071
UNSW Sydney · AUUniversity of Technology Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo investigate if there are inequities in quality and safety outcomes for children with intellectual disability admitted to two tertiary paediatric hospitals.

methodA cross-sectional study of 1367 admissions for 1018 randomly selected patients admitted for more than 23 hours to one of two tertiary children's hospitals in Sydney, Australia (1st January-31st December 2017). Electronic medical records were manually interrogated to identify children with intellectual disability (including developmental delay). Data extracted included patient demographics, length of stay, number of admissions, and reported clinical incidents.

resultsIn total, 12.3% (n=125) of children admitted during the study period had intellectual disability, which represented 13.9% (n=190) of admissions. Sex and age at admission in children with and without intellectual disability were similar: 83 (43.7%) vs 507 (43.1%) females and 107 (56.3%) vs 670 (56.9%) males, p=0.875; median age 3 years (0-18y) vs 4 years (0-18y), p=0.122. Children with intellectual disability had significantly greater median length of stay (100.5h vs 79h, p<0.001) and cost of admission (A$11 596.38 vs A$8497.96) than their peers (p=0.001). Children with intellectual disability had more admissions with at least one incident compared to children without intellectual disability (14.7% vs 9.7%); this was not statistically significant (p=0.06).

interpretationChildren with intellectual disability experience inequitable quality and safety outcomes in hospital. Engaging children and families in clinical incident reporting may enhance understanding of safety risks for children with intellectual disability in hospital.

Indexed as

Developmental DisabilitiesIntellectual DisabilityAdolescentChildChild, HospitalizedChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFacilities and Services UtilizationFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHospitalizationHospitals, PediatricHumansInfantLength of StayMale

Identifiers

PMID34562021
PMCPMC9293445
OpenAlexW3199042870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.