Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34561852›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2022

Increased reliance on top-down information to compensate for reduced bottom-up use of acoustic cues in dyslexia.

Hadeer Derawi, Eva Reinisch, Yafit Gabay

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hadeer DerawiDepartment of Special Education, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, 31905, Haifa, Israel.
Eva ReinischSciences of Academy Austrian ,Institute Research Acoustics, Vienna, Austria.
Yafit GabayDepartment of Special Education, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, 31905, Haifa, Israel. ygabay@edu.haifa.ac.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7899-3044
University of Haifa · ILVienna Consulting Engineers (Austria) · AT

Funding

German Research Foundation RE 3047/1-1National Institute of Psychobiology in Israel 2111819
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Speech recognition is a complex human behavior in the course of which listeners must integrate the detailed phonetic information present in the acoustic signal with their general linguistic knowledge. It is commonly assumed that this process occurs effortlessly for most people, but it is still unclear whether this also holds true in the case of developmental dyslexia (DD), a condition characterized by perceptual deficits. In the present study, we used a dual-task setting to test the assumption that speech recognition is effortful for people with DD. In particular, we tested the Ganong effect (i.e., lexical bias on phoneme identification) while participants performed a secondary task of either low or high cognitive demand. We presumed that reduced efficiency in perceptual processing in DD would manifest in greater modulation in the performance of primary task by cognitive load. Results revealed that this was indeed the case. We found a larger Ganong effect in the DD group under high than under low cognitive load, and this modulation was larger than it was for typically developed (TD) readers. Furthermore, phoneme categorization was less precise in the DD group than in the TD group. These findings suggest that individuals with DD show increased reliance on top-down lexically mediated perception processes, possibly as a compensatory mechanism for reduced efficiency in bottom-up use of acoustic cues. This indicates an imbalance between bottom-up and top-down processes in speech recognition of individuals with DD.

Indexed as

DyslexiaSpeech PerceptionAcousticsAcoustic StimulationCuesHumansPhoneticsDevelopmental dyslexiaDual taskGanong effectLexical biasSpeech perceptionSpoken word recognition

Identifiers

PMID34561852
PMCPMC8858289
OpenAlexW3199885462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.