Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34561815›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2021

The impact of joint attention on the sound-induced flash illusions.

Lucas Battich, Isabelle Garzorz, Basil Wahn, Ophelia Deroy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Covert neural and autonomic signatures of shared perception.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lucas BattichGraduate School of Systemic Neurosciences, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany. Lucas.Battich@campus.lmu.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6102-7835
Isabelle GarzorzFaculty of Philosophy, Philosophy of Science and Religious Studies, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Geschwister-Scholl-Platz 1, 80359, Munich, Germany.
Basil WahnDepartment of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Ophelia DeroyFaculty of Philosophy, Philosophy of Science and Religious Studies, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Geschwister-Scholl-Platz 1, 80359, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans coordinate their focus of attention with others, either by gaze following or prior agreement. Though the effects of joint attention on perceptual and cognitive processing tend to be examined in purely visual environments, they should also show in multisensory settings. According to a prevalent hypothesis, joint attention enhances visual information encoding and processing, over and above individual attention. If two individuals jointly attend to the visual components of an audiovisual event, this should affect the weighing of visual information during multisensory integration. We tested this prediction in this preregistered study, using the well-documented sound-induced flash illusions, where the integration of an incongruent number of visual flashes and auditory beeps results in a single flash being seen as two (fission illusion) and two flashes as one (fusion illusion). Participants were asked to count flashes either alone or together, and expected to be less prone to both fission and fusion illusions when they jointly attended to the visual targets. However, illusions were as frequent when people attended to the flashes alone or with someone else, even though they responded faster during joint attention. Our results reveal the limitations of the theory that joint attention enhances visual processing as it does not affect temporal audiovisual integration.

Indexed as

IllusionsAcoustic StimulationAttentionAuditory PerceptionHumansPhotic StimulationVisual PerceptionJoint attentionMultisensory integrationSound-induced flash illusion

Identifiers

PMID34561815
PMCPMC8550716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.