ArticleJournal of digital imaging2021
Active Learning for Efficient Segmentation of Liver with Convolutional Neural Network-Corrected Labeling in Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Derived Proton Density Fat Fraction.
Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Smart Devices in Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Steatotic Liver Disease.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2026Article
- RIDGE: Reproducibility, Integrity, Dependability, Generalizability, and Efficiency Assessment of Medical Image Segmentation Models.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to propose an efficient method for self-automated segmentation of the liver using magnetic resonance imaging-derived proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) through deep active learning. We developed an active learning framework for liver segmentation using labeled and unlabeled data in MRI-PDFF. A total of 77 liver samples on MRI-PDFF were obtained from patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. For the training, tuning, and testing of the liver segmentation, the ground truth of 71 (internal) and 6 (external) MRI-PDFF scans for training and testing were verified by an expert reviewer. For 100 randomly selected slices, manual and deep learning (DL) segmentations for visual assessments were classified, ranging from very accurate to mostly accurate. The dice similarity coefficients for each step were 0.69 ± 0.21, 0.85 ± 0.12, and 0.94 ± 0.01, respectively (p-value = 0.1389 between the first step and the second step or p-value = 0.0144 between the first step and the third step for paired t-test), indicating that active learning provides superior performance compared with non-active learning. The biases in the Bland-Altman plots for each step were - 24.22% (from - 82.76 to - 2.70), - 21.29% (from - 59.52 to 3.06), and - 0.67% (from - 10.43 to 4.06). Additionally, there was a fivefold reduction in the required annotation time after the application of active learning (2 min with, and 13 min without, active learning in the first step). The number of very accurate slices for DL (46 slices) was greater than that for manual segmentations (6 slices). Deep active learning enables efficient learning for liver segmentation on a limited MRI-PDFF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.