Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34561782›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2021

Active Learning for Efficient Segmentation of Liver with Convolutional Neural Network-Corrected Labeling in Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Derived Proton Density Fat Fraction.

Yongwon Cho, Min Ju Kim, Beom Jin Park, Ki Choon Sim, Yeom Suk Keu, Yeo Eun Han, Deuk Jae Sung, Na Yeon Han

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yongwon ChoDepartment of Radiology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, 73, Goryeodae-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea.
Min Ju KimDepartment of Radiology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, 73, Goryeodae-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea. dr.minjukim@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0979-9835
Beom Jin ParkDepartment of Radiology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, 73, Goryeodae-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea.
Ki Choon SimDepartment of Radiology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, 73, Goryeodae-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea.
Yeom Suk KeuDepartment of Radiology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, 123, Jeokgeum-ro, Ansan-si, 425-707, Republic of Korea.
Yeo Eun HanDepartment of Radiology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, 73, Goryeodae-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea.
Deuk Jae SungDepartment of Radiology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, 73, Goryeodae-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea.
Na Yeon HanDepartment of Radiology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, 73, Goryeodae-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to propose an efficient method for self-automated segmentation of the liver using magnetic resonance imaging-derived proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) through deep active learning. We developed an active learning framework for liver segmentation using labeled and unlabeled data in MRI-PDFF. A total of 77 liver samples on MRI-PDFF were obtained from patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. For the training, tuning, and testing of the liver segmentation, the ground truth of 71 (internal) and 6 (external) MRI-PDFF scans for training and testing were verified by an expert reviewer. For 100 randomly selected slices, manual and deep learning (DL) segmentations for visual assessments were classified, ranging from very accurate to mostly accurate. The dice similarity coefficients for each step were 0.69 ± 0.21, 0.85 ± 0.12, and 0.94 ± 0.01, respectively (p-value = 0.1389 between the first step and the second step or p-value = 0.0144 between the first step and the third step for paired t-test), indicating that active learning provides superior performance compared with non-active learning. The biases in the Bland-Altman plots for each step were - 24.22% (from - 82.76 to - 2.70), - 21.29% (from - 59.52 to 3.06), and - 0.67% (from - 10.43 to 4.06). Additionally, there was a fivefold reduction in the required annotation time after the application of active learning (2 min with, and 13 min without, active learning in the first step). The number of very accurate slices for DL (46 slices) was greater than that for manual segmentations (6 slices). Deep active learning enables efficient learning for liver segmentation on a limited MRI-PDFF.

Indexed as

ProtonsHumansLiverMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerProtonsAbdominal image analysisActive learningConvolution neural networkDeep learningProton density fat fraction

Identifiers

PMID34561782
PMCPMC8554963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.