Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34561751›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2021

Alternative applications of the strategic control against the cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus in a subtropical area.

Santiago Nava, José R Toffaletti, Maria V Rossner, Nicolás Morel, Atilio J Mangold

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Brazil's battle against Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus ticks: current strategies and future directions.Revista brasileira de parasitologia veterinaria = Brazilian journal of veterinary parasitology : Orgao Oficial do Colegio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinaria · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Santiago NavaIDICAL (INTA-CONICET), Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA) E.E.A. Rafaela, Ruta 34 Km 227, Rafaela, Santa Fe, Argentina. nava.santiago@inta.gob.ar.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7791-4239
José R ToffalettiInstituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA) E.E.A. El Colorado, El Colorado, Formosa, Argentina.
Maria V RossnerInstituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA) E.E.A. El Colonia Benítez, Colonia Benítez, Chaco, Argentina.
Nicolás MorelIDICAL (INTA-CONICET), Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA) E.E.A. Rafaela, Ruta 34 Km 227, Rafaela, Santa Fe, Argentina.
Atilio J MangoldIDICAL (INTA-CONICET), Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA) E.E.A. Rafaela, Ruta 34 Km 227, Rafaela, Santa Fe, Argentina.
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARNational Agricultural Technology Institute · AR

Funding

Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria PEI109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although different evaluations on the efficacy of the strategic control against Rhipicephalus microplus have been performed, the effects of successive applications of these schemes on the abundance of cattle ticks have not been evaluated. The aim of this work was to analyse the long-term effect of strategic applications of chemical acaricides on the R. microplus infestation in cattle in a subtropical area. These schemes are based on the application of three annual treatments between late winter and late spring. Additionally, a trial to evaluate the efficacy of the strategic control by deferring the first treatment from late winter to spring and the third treatment from late spring to summer was also carried out. The efficacy of the strategic control applied on 3 consecutive years was significant. The tick infestation in the treated group always remained at low levels, because mean number of ticks was almost never higher than 20. Regarding the trial where the third application of acaricide was deferred from spring to summer, and the first one from late winter to spring, the differences between treated and control group were significant in all post-treatment counts. The results of this study add evidence that support the sustainability of the strategic control in subtropical areas where the population dynamics of R. microplus is characterized by a well-marked seasonal pattern. Three relevant aspects were determined: (i) the feasibility and efficacy of successive applications of the strategic control in consecutive years; (ii) the time window to start the sequence of treatments is from late winter to mid-spring; (iii) it is achievable deferring the last treatment from late spring to summer if the tick infestation levels on cattle are low enough to allow it.

Indexed as

AcaricidesCattle DiseasesRhipicephalusTick InfestationsAnimalsCattleSeasonsTick ControlAcaricidesArgentinaChemical acaricidesControlRhipicephalus microplus

Identifiers

PMID34561751
OpenAlexW3201319175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.