Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34561726›Full record

ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2022

Endoscopic Transaxillary Approach for Breast Augmentation: What does the Evidence Say and What Else Can be Done?

Jerry Lorren Dominic, Paul Berry, Amudhan Kannan, Addisalem Hailu Wondafrash, Luis Reyes, George Keckeisen

Abstract readLetterComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jerry Lorren DominicDepartment of Surgery, South Texas Health System, Edinburg, Texas, United States.
Paul BerryDepartment of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Texas, United States.
Amudhan KannanJawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Gorimedu, Puducherry, 605006, India. amudhankannan.2499@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7289-7035
Addisalem Hailu WondafrashSouth Texas Health System Heart, McAllen, Texas, United States.
Luis ReyesDirector of Bariatric Surgery, South Texas Health System Heart, McAllen, Texas, United States.
George KeckeisenChief of Surgery, Stony Brook Medicine/Southampton Hospital, New York, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast augmentation is the most commonly performed aesthetic procedure. Transaxillary approach is one of the widely accepted techniques for breast augmentation. It has an advantage of the remote nature of the access incision related to the breasts, thereby reducing the visibility of the scar. This is a letter to the editor of the Aesthetic Plastic Surgery journal about the study by Nguyen and to on comparison of endoscopic transaxillary and periareolar techniques in breast augmentation. We have talked about the advantages of the transaxillary approach compared to other techniques and presented the evidence. We recommend future studies comparing the transaxillary, periareolar, and inframammary approaches for breast augmentation with a large cohort and systematic reviews on the same topic. Studies can also be done by combining the cell-assisted lipotransfer with fat graft and endoscopic transaxillary approach for breast augmentation to determine if it provides the best outcome with minimal complications.Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

Breast ImplantationBreast ImplantsMammaplastyBreastEstheticsHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBreast augmentationEndoscopic transaxillary approachLipotransferOutcomesTransaxillary approach

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.