ArticleEvidence-based dentistry2021
Can protective factors prevent caries in preschool children?
Article in Evidence-based dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Iranian early childhood dental caries: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence and associated risk factors.Evidence-based dentistry · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Design A case-control randomised trial.Case/control selection Preschools in Tehran/Iran were selected for inclusion through multi-stage cluster random sampling. They were divided into strata based on population density and a preschool from each was randomly selected. From this, children aged 4-6 years were identified. Twelve children from each preschool were placed into the 'caries-free' experimental group and 12 into the 'caries present' control group. Where insufficient experimental group participants were recruited, additional control group participants were included. Incentives for participation included free preventive procedures and completion of required dental treatment. All participants underwent intraoral examinations and independent parent questionnaires. The study received ethical approval.Data analysis Participants were assessed objectively for caries status by blinded calibrated examiners, using a standardised and validated questionnaire as part of a face-to-face interview. This questionnaire included three domains: sociodemographic factors, behavioural oral health measures and feeding practices/dietary habits. Sociodemographic characteristic recorded included sex, age, the number of siblings and the parents' level of education. A logistic regression model was applied to identify caries-free protective factors (p <0.05). The collected data was then entered into the SPSS software version 21 for statistical analysis.Results In total, 528 participants were recruited, with 28 ineligible due to lack of consent. This resulted in 230 participants in the experimental group and 270 in the control group. Protective factors against dental caries were identified as: dental check-up as the cause of dental visit; being the eldest child in the family; minimised night feeding; family owning their residence; and parents having university-level education (p <0.05). Antibiotic consumption and mothers who were not able to make their children brush their teeth were not identified as factors.Conclusions The outcome showed that protective factors including regular check-up and socioeconomic factors are associated with dental health. Dental check-up as the cause of dental visit, being the eldest child in the family, minimised night feeding, family owning their residence and parents having university-level education reduce the chance of preschool children suffering dental caries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34561666What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.