Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34561662›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based dentistry2021

Management options of early childhood caries.

Lauren Crowder

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. AnInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Lauren CrowderGlasgow Dental Hospital, Glasgow, G2 3JZ, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data sources The review searched for articles via Medline up to March 2019 for English language papers only.Study selection Two authors screened the reviews initially against the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Discrepancies were discussed with all authors for the final decision. Due to a low number of higher-level studies on non-operative caries management (NOCM; excluding silver diamine fluoride [SDF]), studies other than randomised controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included to allow some collation of evidence for an overview to be gained.Data extraction and synthesis Data extracted included setting, participants, focused question, search results, comparators, main outcomes and conclusion. Data for SDF was collated separately to other NOCM due to the higher level of evidence and its use in cavitated lesions as well as non-cavitated carious lesions.Results Five systematic reviews investigated SDF use. All the reviews demonstrated SDF to be an effective management tool for arresting early caries. Ten studies looked at NOCM, which showed fluoride varnish has a moderate effect on arresting carious lesions, but the evidence was of low level. For restorative approaches, a low level of evidence showed resin restorations to have a higher failure rate than composite strip crowns, regardless of general anaesthesia, and more so than stainless steel or zirconia crowns.Conclusions SDF is an effective tool in the management of early childhood caries.

Indexed as

Dental CariesDental Caries SusceptibilityChild, PreschoolCrownsDental CareFluoridesFluorides, TopicalHumansFluoridesFluorides, Topical

Identifiers

PMID34561662
OpenAlexW3200838900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.