ArticleBritish dental journal2021
Collaborative leadership with a focus on stakeholder identification and engagement and ethical leadership: a dental perspective.
Article in British dental journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing Nursing Competencies: An Assessment of Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Dental Trauma Management Among Nursing Students-An Interventional Study.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2024Article
- Towards Wiser Prescribing of Antibiotics in Dental Practice: What Pharmacists Want Dentists to Know.Dentistry journal · 2024Review
- Challenges and solutions to banning the advertisement of unhealthy products: a qualitative study.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Leadership and Managerial Skills in Dentistry: Characteristics and Challenges Based on a Preliminary Case Study.Dentistry journal · 2022Article
- Business as (un)usual: A qualitative study of clerkship experiences during a health crisis.Medical education · 2022Article
- Premature Loss of Deciduous Teeth as a Symptom of Systemic Disease: A Narrative Literature Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- E-Professionalism among Dental Students from Malaysia and Finland.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The dental profession is susceptible to change. In order to cope and adapt, individuals and organisations will need to work together, now more than ever. One approach that may be beneficial in these times, and beyond, is collaborative leadership. This is where a mutually beneficial relationship is established between two or more parties, who work towards common goals by sharing authority, responsibility and accountability for achieving results. When groups of individuals look beyond their personal interests and instead collaborate, they may channel their efforts to successfully achieve shared goals. However, for this to be fruitful, stakeholders (to include different individuals or groups that have a vested interest) will need to be identified and engaged, and ethical values based on the objectives of the organisation and those advocated by professional and regulatory bodies must be upheld. This paper explores how the traditional practices of stakeholder identification and engagement, as well as ethical leadership, may be of relevance in attaining success through the contemporary collaborative leadership approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.