Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34561514›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Evaluation of Twitter data for an emerging crisis: an application to the first wave of COVID-19 in the UK.

I Kit Cheng, Johannes Heyl, Nisha Lad, Gabriel Facini, Zara Grout

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A global portrait of expressed mental health signals towards COVID-19 in social media space.International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Social media mining under the COVID-19 context: Progress, challenges, and opportunities.International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

I Kit Cheng *Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Johannes Heyl *Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK. johannes.heyl.19@ucl.ac.uk.
Nisha Lad *Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Gabriel FaciniDepartment of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Zara GroutDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.

Funding

Science and Technology Facilities Council ST/P006736/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the absence of nationwide mass testing for an emerging health crisis, alternative approaches could provide necessary information efficiently to aid policy makers and health bodies when dealing with a pandemic. The following work presents a methodology by which Twitter data surrounding the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK is harvested and analysed using two main approaches. The first is an investigation into localized outbreak predictions by developing a prototype early-warning system using the distribution of total tweet volume. The temporal lag between the rises in the number of COVID-19 related tweets and officially reported deaths by Public Health England (PHE) is observed to be 6-27 days for various UK cities which matches the temporal lag values found in the literature. To better understand the topics of discussion and attitudes of people surrounding the pandemic, the second approach is an in-depth behavioural analysis assessing the public opinion and response to government policies such as the introduction of face-coverings. Using topic modelling, nine distinct topics are identified within the corpus of COVID-19 tweets, of which the themes ranged from retail to government bodies. Sentiment analysis on a subset of mask related tweets revealed sentiment spikes corresponding to major news and announcements. A Named Entity Recognition (NER) algorithm is trained and applied in a semi-supervised manner to recognise tweets containing location keywords within the unlabelled corpus and achieved a precision of 81.6%. Overall, these approaches allowed extraction of temporal trends relating to PHE case numbers, popular locations in relation to the use of face-coverings, and attitudes towards face-coverings, vaccines and the national 'Test and Trace' scheme.

Indexed as

Social MediaCOVID-19Disease OutbreaksHumansSARS-CoV-2United Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID34561514
PMCPMC8463665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.