Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34561239›Full record

ArticleBMJ open respiratory research2021

Serological responses to SARS-CoV-2 following non-hospitalised infection: clinical and ethnodemographic features associated with the magnitude of the antibody response.

Adrian M Shields, Sian E Faustini, Marisol Perez-Toledo, Sian Jossi, Joel D Allen, Saly Al-Taei, Claire Backhouse, Lynsey A Dunbar, Daniel Ebanks, Beena Emmanuel and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open respiratory research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Adrian M Shields *Department of Clinical Immunology Service, University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK.
Sian E Faustini *Department of Clinical Immunology Service, University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK.
Marisol Perez-ToledoInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Sian JossiInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Joel D AllenSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Saly Al-TaeiDepartment of Clinical Immunology Service, University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK.
Claire BackhouseDepartment of Clinical Immunology Service, University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK.
Lynsey A DunbarDepartment of Clinical Immunology Service, University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK.
Daniel EbanksDepartment of Clinical Immunology Service, University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK.
Beena EmmanuelDepartment of Clinical Immunology Service, University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK.
Aduragbemi A FaniyiBirmingham Acute Care Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Mark GarveyUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Annabel GrinbergsUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Golaleh McGinnellUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Joanne O'NeillUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Yasunori WatanabeSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Max CrispinSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
David C WraithInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Adam F CunninghamMRC Centre for Immune Regulation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Mark T DraysonDepartment of Clinical Immunology Service, University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK.
Alex G RichterDepartment of Clinical Immunology Service, University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK a.g.richter@bham.ac.uk.
University of Birmingham · GBUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

Identification of neutralizing epitopes on SARS-CoV-2 spike for design of vaccines and small-molecule antiviralsUM1AI144462 · NIAID · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI BURTON, DENNIS R. · 2019 to 2025
$201.6M
Medical Research Council MC_PC_17183NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI144462
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine clinical and ethnodemographic correlates of serological responses against the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein following mild-to-moderate COVID-19.

designA retrospective cohort study of healthcare workers who had self-isolated due to COVID-19.

settingUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, UK (UHBFT).

participants956 healthcare workers were recruited by open invitation via UHBFT trust email and social media between 27 April 2020 and the 8 June 2020.

interventionParticipants volunteered a venous blood sample that was tested for the presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein antibodies. Results were interpreted in the context of the symptoms of their original illness and ethnodemographic variables.

resultsUsing an assay that simultaneously measures the combined IgG, IgA and IgM response against the spike glycoprotein (IgGAM), the overall seroprevalence within this cohort was 46.2% (n=442/956). The seroprevalence of immunoglobulin isotypes was 36.3%, 18.7% and 8.1% for IgG, IgA and IgM, respectively. IgGAM identified serological responses in 40.6% (n=52/128) of symptomatic individuals who reported a negative SARS-CoV-2 PCR test. Increasing age, non-white ethnicity and obesity were independently associated with greater IgG antibody response against the spike glycoprotein. Self-reported fever and fatigue were associated with greater IgG and IgA responses against the spike glycoprotein. The combination of fever and/or cough and/or anosmia had a positive predictive value of 92.3% for seropositivity in self-isolating individuals a time when Wuhan strain SARS-CoV-2 was predominant. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Assays employing combined antibody detection demonstrate enhanced seroepidemiological sensitivity and can detect prior viral exposure even when PCR swabs have been negative. We demonstrate an association between known ethnodemographic risk factors associated with mortality from COVID-19 and the magnitude of serological responses in mild-to-moderate disease.

Indexed as

Antibody FormationCOVID-19AdultAntibodies, ViralFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSeroepidemiologic StudiesUnited KingdomAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin Mclinical epidemiologyCOVID-19respiratory infection

Identifiers

PMID34561239
PMCPMC8474079
OpenAlexW3204594147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.