Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34560898›Full record

Observational studyJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2021

Smoothness metric during reach-to-grasp after stroke: part 2. longitudinal association with motor impairment.

Mique Saes, Mohamed Irfan Mohamed Refai, Joost van Kordelaar, Bouke L Scheltinga, Bert-Jan F van Beijnum, Johannes B J Bussmann, Jaap H Buurke, Peter H Veltink, Carel G M Meskers, Erwin E H van Wegen and 1 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Novel Platform for Quantitative Assessment of Functional Object Interactions After Stroke.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mique SaesDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Neuroscience, de Boelelaan 1117, Location VUmc, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mohamed Irfan Mohamed RefaiDepartment of Biomedical Signals & Systems, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Joost van KordelaarDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Neuroscience, de Boelelaan 1117, Location VUmc, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bouke L ScheltingaDepartment of Biomedical Signals & Systems, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Bert-Jan F van BeijnumDepartment of Biomedical Signals & Systems, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Johannes B J BussmannDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jaap H BuurkeDepartment of Biomedical Signals & Systems, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Peter H VeltinkDepartment of Biomedical Signals & Systems, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Carel G M MeskersDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Neuroscience, de Boelelaan 1117, Location VUmc, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Erwin E H van WegenDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Neuroscience, de Boelelaan 1117, Location VUmc, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gert KwakkelDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Neuroscience, de Boelelaan 1117, Location VUmc, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. G.Kwakkel@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-4041-4043

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe cause of smoothness deficits as a proxy for quality of movement post stroke is currently unclear. Previous simulation analyses showed that spectral arc length (SPARC) is a valid metric for investigating smoothness during a multi-joint goal-directed reaching task. The goal of this observational study was to investigate how SPARC values change over time, and whether SPARC is longitudinally associated with the recovery from motor impairments reflected by the Fugl-Meyer motor assessment of the upper extremity (FM-UE) in the first 6 months after stroke.

methodsForty patients who suffered a first-ever unilateral ischemic stroke (22 males, aged 58.6 ± 12.5 years) with upper extremity paresis underwent kinematic and clinical measurements in weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 12, and 26 post stroke. Clinical measures included amongst others FM-UE. SPARC was obtained by three-dimensional kinematic measurements using an electromagnetic motion tracking system during a reach-to-grasp movement. Kinematic assessments of 12 healthy, age-matched individuals served as reference. Longitudinal linear mixed model analyses were performed to determine SPARC change over time, compare smoothness in patients with reference values of healthy individuals, and establish the longitudinal association between SPARC and FM-UE scores.

resultsSPARC showed a significant positive longitudinal association with FM-UE (B: 31.73, 95%-CI: [27.27 36.20], P < 0.001), which encompassed significant within- and between-subject effects (B: 30.85, 95%-CI: [26.28 35.41], P < 0.001 and B: 50.59, 95%-CI: [29.97 71.21], P < 0.001, respectively). Until 5 weeks post stroke, progress of time contributed significantly to the increase in SPARC and FM-UE scores (P < 0.05), whereafter they levelled off. At group level, smoothness was lower in patients who suffered a stroke compared to healthy subjects at all time points (P < 0.05).

conclusionsThe present findings show that, after stroke, recovery of smoothness in a multi-joint reaching task and recovery from motor impairments are longitudinally associated and follow a similar time course. This suggests that the reduction of smoothness deficits quantified by SPARC is a proper objective reflection of recovery from motor impairment, as reflected by FM-UE, probably driven by a common underlying process of spontaneous neurological recovery early post stroke.

Indexed as

Motor DisordersStrokeStroke RehabilitationHumansMaleParesisRecovery of FunctionUpper ExtremityKinematicsLongitudinal studyRecoverySmoothnessStrokeUpper extremity

Identifiers

PMID34560898
PMCPMC8461930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.