ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2021
Optimizing inhalation therapy in the aspect of peak inhalation flow rate in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma.
Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inspiratory capacity and inhalation techniques evaluated and training by digital therapy comprehensive management platform in COPD patients.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Article
- Exacerbations and Decreased Lung Function Predict Nebulizer Use and Uptake in COPD and Tobacco Exposed Persons With Preserved SpirometryChronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.) · 2026Article
- Evolution of Peak Inspiratory Flow During Hospitalization of Patients with COPD - A Prospective Monocentric Observational Study.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2025Observational
- Study protocol for impact of visual inhaler technique instructions on short-term outcomes in hospitalized patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Downstream Effects of Market Changes on Inhalers: Impacts on Individuals With Chronic Lung Disease.Respiratory care · 2024Review
- Flowrate Sensing and Measurement in Portable Smart Inhalers.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Comparisons between In-Check DIAL® and PF810® in evaluation and training inspiratory capacity for using dry powder inhalers.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2024Article
- Suboptimal peak inspiratory flow rate: a noticeable risk factor for inhaler concordance in patients with chronic airway diseases.BMJ open respiratory research · 2024Observational
- Exploration of quality criteria for the detection of peak inspiratory flow under different resistance conditions.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024Article
- Standardized inhalation capability assessment: A key to optimal inhaler selection for inhalation therapy.Journal of translational internal medicine · 2023Article
- Nurses in China lack knowledge of inhaler devices: A cross-sectional study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs) and dry powder inhalers (DPIs) are commonly used drug-delivering devices for patients with chronic airway diseases. Appropriate peak inhalation flow rate (PIFR) and inhaler technique is essential for effective therapy. We aimed at optimizing inhalation therapy through the analysis of PIFRs in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma as well as the effect of technique training using In-Check DIAL® to help patients to achieve their optimal inspiratory flow rates.
methodsThe study continuously enrolled patients who were diagnosed as COPD or asthma from respiratory clinics. PIFRs were described and analyzed between the newly-diagnosed and follow-up patients, and the stable and acute exacerbation patients, respectively. Every participant was trained inhaler technique using In-Check DIAL®. PIFRs before and after training was compared by self-control analysis.
resultsAmong a total of 209 patients, the average age was 56.9 years. For DPIs users, 10.8% patients had a PIFR < 30 L/min and 44.1% patients had a PIFR ≥ 60 L/min before technique training. After technique training, scarcely patient (1.5%) had a PIFR < 30 L/min, and 60.5% patients had a PIFR ≥ 60 L/min. The patient's average PIFR increased by 5.6L/min after training. The increase in PIFR before and after training was significant (p < 0.001) for most patients, but no significant variation was found in patients with acute exacerbation (p = 0.822).
conclusionsA considerable number of patients with COPD or asthma were not able to achieve the minimum or optimal PIFR for DPIs. Inhaler training can increase patients' PIFRs and improve their ability to use DPIs. Trail registration The study has registered in chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR1900024707) and been approved by the Ethics Committee of Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University (B2019-142).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.