Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34560284›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of learning and memory2021

Prelimbic cortex maintains attention to category-relevant information and flexibly updates category representations.

Matthew B Broschard, Jangjin Kim, Bradley C Love, Edward A Wasserman, John H Freeman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of learning and memory, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Distinct Hippocampal Mechanisms Support Concept Formation and Updating.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Cognitive Maps in the Prefrontal Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Dissociable Roles of the Dorsolateral and Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex in Human Categorization.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matthew B BroschardDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA. Electronic address: matthew-broschard@uiowa.edu.
Jangjin KimDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Bradley C LoveDepartment of Experimental Psychology and The Alan Turing Institute, University College London, London, UK.
Edward A WassermanDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
John H FreemanDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.

Funding

ONTOGENESIS OF CATEGORIZATION: LINKING DEVELOPMENT, MECHANISMS, AND BIOLOGYP01HD080679 · NICHD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LOVE, BRADLEY C · 2016 to 2020
$5.8M
NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD080679Wellcome Trust WT106931MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Category learning groups stimuli according to similarity or function. This involves finding and attending to stimulus features that reliably inform category membership. Although many of the neural mechanisms underlying categorization remain elusive, models of human category learning posit that prefrontal cortex plays a substantial role. Here, we investigated the role of the prelimbic cortex (PL) in rat visual category learning by administering excitotoxic lesions before category training and then evaluating the effects of the lesions with computational modeling. Using a touchscreen apparatus, rats (female and male) learned to categorize distributions of category stimuli that varied along two continuous dimensions. For some rats, categorizing the stimuli encouraged selective attention towards a single stimulus dimension (i.e., 1D tasks). For other rats, categorizing the stimuli required divided attention towards both stimulus dimensions (i.e., 2D tasks). Testing sessions then examined generalization to novel exemplars. PL lesions impaired learning and generalization for the 1D tasks, but not the 2D tasks. Then, a neural network was fit to the behavioral data to examine how the lesions affected categorization. The results suggest that the PL facilitates category learning by maintaining attention to category-relevant information and updating category representations.

Indexed as

AnimalsAttentionConcept FormationConditioning, OperantFemaleMalePhotic StimulationPrefrontal CortexRatsRats, Long-EvansCategory learningExecutive functionsPrelimbic prefrontal cortexRatSUSTAINTouchscreen

Identifiers

PMID34560284
PMCPMC8633767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.