ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2021
Query bot for retrieving patients' clinical history: A COVID-19 use-case.
Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWith increasing patient complexity whose data are stored in fragmented health information systems, automated and time-efficient ways of gathering important information from the patients' medical history are needed for effective clinical decision making. Using COVID-19 as a case study, we developed a query-bot information retrieval system with user-feedback to allow clinicians to ask natural questions to retrieve data from patient notes. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe applied clinicalBERT, a pre-trained contextual language model, to our dataset of patient notes to obtain sentence embeddings, using K-Means to reduce computation time for real-time interaction. Rocchio algorithm was then employed to incorporate user-feedback and improve retrieval performance.
resultsIn an iterative feedback loop experiment, MAP for final iteration was 0.93/0.94 as compared to initial MAP of 0.66/0.52 for generic and 1./1. compared to 0.79/0.83 for COVID-19 specific queries confirming that contextual model handles the ambiguity in natural language queries and feedback helps to improve retrieval performance. User-in-loop experiment also outperformed the automated pseudo relevance feedback method. Moreover, the null hypothesis which assumes identical precision between initial retrieval and relevance feedback was rejected with high statistical significance (p ≪ 0.05). Compared to Word2Vec, TF-IDF and bioBERT models, clinicalBERT works optimally considering the balance between response precision and user-feedback. DISCUSSION: Our model works well for generic as well as COVID-19 specific queries. However, some generic queries are not answered as well as others because clustering reduces query performance and vague relations between queries and sentences are considered non-relevant. We also tested our model for queries with the same meaning but different expressions and demonstrated that these query variations yielded similar performance after incorporation of user-feedback.
conclusionIn conclusion, we develop an NLP-based query-bot that handles synonyms and natural language ambiguity in order to retrieve relevant information from the patient chart. User-feedback is critical to improve model performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.