Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34560251›Full record

ArticlePharmacological research2021

TOP1 modulation during melanoma progression and in adaptative resistance to BRAF and MEK inhibitors.

Érica Aparecida de Oliveira, Jagat Chauhan, Julia Rezende da Silva, Larissa Anastacio da Costa Carvalho, Diogo Dias, Danielle Gonçalves de Carvalho, Luis Roberto Masao Watanabe, Vito W Rebecca, Gordon Mills, Yiling Lu and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacological research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Tumor Cell Resistance to the Inhibition of BRAF and MEK1/2.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Érica Aparecida de OliveiraSkin Biology Group, Clinical Chemistry and Toxicology Department, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Sao Paulo, FCF/USP, Brazil; Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, UK.
Jagat ChauhanLudwig Institute for Cancer Research, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, UK.
Julia Rezende da SilvaSkin Biology Group, Clinical Chemistry and Toxicology Department, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Sao Paulo, FCF/USP, Brazil.
Larissa Anastacio da Costa CarvalhoSkin Biology Group, Clinical Chemistry and Toxicology Department, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Sao Paulo, FCF/USP, Brazil.
Diogo DiasLudwig Institute for Cancer Research, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, UK.
Danielle Gonçalves de CarvalhoDivision of Cellular Biology, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Brazil.
Luis Roberto Masao WatanabeSkin Biology Group, Clinical Chemistry and Toxicology Department, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Sao Paulo, FCF/USP, Brazil.
Vito W RebeccaMolecular and Cellular Oncogenesis Program and Melanoma Research Center, Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Gordon MillsOregon Health & Science University, USA.
Yiling LuThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Aloisio Souza Felipe da SilvaDepartment of Pathology, Anatomic Pathology Service, University Hospital, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Márcia Edilaine Lopes ConsolaroDepartment of Clinical Analysis and Biomedicine, State University of Maringá, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil.
Meenhard HerlynMolecular and Cellular Oncogenesis Program and Melanoma Research Center, Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Patricia A PossikDivision of Cellular Biology, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Brazil.
Colin R GodingLudwig Institute for Cancer Research, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, UK.
Silvya Stuchi Maria-EnglerSkin Biology Group, Clinical Chemistry and Toxicology Department, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Sao Paulo, FCF/USP, Brazil. Electronic address: silvya@usp.br.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversity of Oxford · GBInstituto Nacional de Câncer - INCA · BRThe Wistar Institute · USOregon Health & Science University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversidade Estadual de Maringá · BR

Funding

Tumor Microenvironment and MetastasisP30CA010815 · NCI · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI Luis J Montaner · 1985 to 2026
$75.9M
Research Project 2 - Targeting Melanoma Tumor Survival and Apoptotic MachineryU54CA224070 · NCI · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI Jessie Villanueva · 2017 to 2026
$13.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA010815NCI NIH HHS U54 CA224070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In melanomas, therapy resistance can arise due to a combination of genetic, epigenetic and phenotypic mechanisms. Due to its crucial role in DNA supercoil relaxation, TOP1 is often considered an essential chemotherapeutic target in cancer. However, how TOP1 expression and activity might differ in therapy sensitive versus resistant cell types is unknown. Here we show that TOP1 expression is increased in metastatic melanoma and correlates with an invasive gene expression signature. More specifically, TOP1 expression is highest in cells with the lowest expression of MITF, a key regulator of melanoma biology. Notably, TOP1 and DNA Single-Strand Break Repair genes are downregulated in BRAFi- and BRAFi/MEKi-resistant cells and TOP1 inhibition decreases invasion markers only in BRAFi/MEKi-resistant cells. Thus, we show three different phenotypes related to TOP1 levels: i) non-malignant cells with low TOP1 levels; ii) metastatic cells with high TOP1 levels and high invasiveness; and iii) BRAFi- and BRAFi/MEKi-resistant cells with low TOP1 levels and high invasiveness. Together, these results highlight the potential role of TOP1 in melanoma progression and resistance.

Indexed as

DNA Topoisomerases, Type IDrug Resistance, NeoplasmMelanomaSkin NeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsCell Line, TumorDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase KinasesProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafAntineoplastic AgentsDNA Topoisomerases, Type IMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase KinasesProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafTOP1 protein, humanMelanomaMITFResistanceTOP1Topotecan

Identifiers

PMID34560251
PMCPMC8729257
OpenAlexW3201412466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.