Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34559880›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2022

A comprehensive digital phenotype for postpartum hemorrhage.

Amanda B Zheutlin, Luciana Vieira, Ryan A Shewcraft, Shilong Li, Zichen Wang, Emilio Schadt, Yu-Han Kao, Susan Gross, Siobhan M Dolan, Joanne Stone and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Artificial Intelligence and Postpartum Hemorrhage.Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.) · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Improving postpartum hemorrhage risk prediction using longitudinal electronic medical records.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amanda B ZheutlinSema4, Stamford, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6987-1435
Luciana VieiraDivision of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Ryan A ShewcraftSema4, Stamford, Connecticut, USA.
Shilong LiSema4, Stamford, Connecticut, USA.
Zichen WangSema4, Stamford, Connecticut, USA.
Emilio SchadtSema4, Stamford, Connecticut, USA.
Yu-Han KaoSema4, Stamford, Connecticut, USA.
Susan GrossSema4, Stamford, Connecticut, USA.
Siobhan M DolanDivision of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Joanne StoneDivision of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Eric SchadtSema4, Stamford, Connecticut, USA.
Li LiSema4, Stamford, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6746-4297
Sema4 (United States) · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe aimed to establish a comprehensive digital phenotype for postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). Current guidelines rely primarily on estimates of blood loss, which can be inaccurate and biased and ignore complementary information readily available in electronic medical records (EMR). Inaccurate and incomplete phenotyping contributes to ongoing challenges in tracking PPH outcomes, developing more accurate risk assessments, and identifying novel interventions. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe constructed a cohort of 71 944 deliveries from the Mount Sinai Health System. Estimates of postpartum blood loss, shifts in hematocrit, administration of uterotonics, surgical interventions, and diagnostic codes were combined to identify PPH, retrospectively. Clinical features were extracted from EMRs and mapped to common data models for maximum interoperability across hospitals. Blinded chart review was done by a physician on a subset of PPH and non-PPH patients and performance was compared to alternate PPH phenotypes. PPH was defined as clinical diagnosis of postpartum hemorrhage documented in the patient's chart upon chart review.

resultsWe identified 6639 PPH deliveries (9% prevalence) using our phenotype-more than 3 times as many as using blood loss alone (N = 1,747), supporting the need to incorporate other diagnostic and intervention data. Chart review revealed our phenotype had 89% accuracy and an F1-score of 0.92. Alternate phenotypes were less accurate, including a common blood loss-based definition (67%) and a previously published digital phenotype (74%).

conclusionWe have developed a scalable, accurate, and valid digital phenotype that may be of significant use for tracking outcomes and ongoing clinical research to deliver better preventative interventions for PPH.

Indexed as

Postpartum HemorrhageCohort StudiesFemaleHumansPhenotypePregnancyPrevalenceRetrospective Studiesdigital phenotypeelectronic medical recordsmaternal morbiditypostpartum hemorrhage

Identifiers

PMID34559880
PMCPMC8757293
OpenAlexW3135072344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.