Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34559842›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Detection and classification of neurons and glial cells in the MADM mouse brain using RetinaNet.

Yuheng Cai, Xuying Zhang, Shahar Z Kovalsky, H Troy Ghashghaei, Alon Greenbaum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yuheng CaiJoint Department of Biomedical Engineering, North Carolina State University and University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7760-211X
Xuying ZhangComparative Medicine Institute, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.
Shahar Z KovalskyDepartment of Mathematics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
H Troy GhashghaeiComparative Medicine Institute, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4306-5712
Alon GreenbaumJoint Department of Biomedical Engineering, North Carolina State University and University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2897-876X

Funding

Mechanisms of cytokinesis and delamination in the cerebral corticesR01NS089795 · NINDS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI GHASHGHAEI, HOOMAN TROY · 2014 to 2018
$1.7M
Role of ependyma in forebrain homeostasisR01NS098370 · NINDS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI GHASHGHAEI, HOOMAN TROY · 2016 to 2020
$1.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS089795NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS098370
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to automatically detect and classify populations of cells in tissue sections is paramount in a wide variety of applications ranging from developmental biology to pathology. Although deep learning algorithms are widely applied to microscopy data, they typically focus on segmentation which requires extensive training and labor-intensive annotation. Here, we utilized object detection networks (neural networks) to detect and classify targets in complex microscopy images, while simplifying data annotation. To this end, we used a RetinaNet model to classify genetically labeled neurons and glia in the brains of Mosaic Analysis with Double Markers (MADM) mice. Our initial RetinaNet-based model achieved an average precision of 0.90 across six classes of cells differentiated by MADM reporter expression and their phenotype (neuron or glia). However, we found that a single RetinaNet model often failed when encountering dense and saturated glial clusters, which show high variability in their shape and fluorophore densities compared to neurons. To overcome this, we introduced a second RetinaNet model dedicated to the detection of glia clusters. Merging the predictions of the two computational models significantly improved the automated cell counting of glial clusters. The proposed cell detection workflow will be instrumental in quantitative analysis of the spatial organization of cellular populations, which is applicable not only to preparations in neuroscience studies, but also to any tissue preparation containing labeled populations of cells.

Indexed as

BrainNeurogliaNeuronsAlgorithmsAnimalsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMiceNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID34559842
PMCPMC8462685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.