Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34559819›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2021

eARDS: A multi-center validation of an interpretable machine learning algorithm of early onset Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) among critically ill adults with COVID-19.

Lakshya Singhal, Yash Garg, Philip Yang, Azade Tabaie, A Ian Wong, Akram Mohammed, Lokesh Chinthala, Dipen Kadaria, Amik Sodhi, Andre L Holder and 6 more

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A case of severe Covid-19 infection as the first manifestation of Cushing's disease.Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism case reports · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Lakshya SinghalDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Yash GargDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Philip YangDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy, and Sleep Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5142-1137
Azade TabaieDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
A Ian WongDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy, and Sleep Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Akram MohammedDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8093-8637
Lokesh ChinthalaDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America.
Dipen KadariaDepartment of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America.
Amik SodhiDepartment of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America.
Andre L HolderDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy, and Sleep Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2635-3923
Annette EsperDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy, and Sleep Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
James M BlumDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Robert L DavisDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America.
Gari D CliffordDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Greg S MartinDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy, and Sleep Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9684-7593
Rishikesan KamaleswaranDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8366-4811

Funding

Implementing a Maternal health and PRegnancy Outcomes Vision for Everyone (IMPROVE)UL1TR002378 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Andres J Garcia, Elizabeth O. Ofili · 2017 to 2026
$92.1M
J: NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002382 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI HENRY M BLUMBERG, Vasiliki Michopoulos · 2017 to 2026
$8.5M
Critical Care Training ProgramT32GM095442 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Craig M Coopersmith · 2011 to 2026
$4.7M
Characterizing patients at risk for sepsis through Big Data (Supplement)K23GM137182 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI HOLDER, ANDRE L · 2020 to 2023
$907k
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002382NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002378NIGMS NIH HHS K23 GM137182NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM095442NIH HHS 2T32 GM095442
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present an interpretable machine learning algorithm called 'eARDS' for predicting ARDS in an ICU population comprising COVID-19 patients, up to 12-hours before satisfying the Berlin clinical criteria. The analysis was conducted on data collected from the Intensive care units (ICU) at Emory Healthcare, Atlanta, GA and University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN and the Cerner® Health Facts Deidentified Database, a multi-site COVID-19 EMR database. The participants in the analysis consisted of adults over 18 years of age. Clinical data from 35,804 patients who developed ARDS and controls were used to generate predictive models that identify risk for ARDS onset up to 12-hours before satisfying the Berlin criteria. We identified salient features from the electronic medical record that predicted respiratory failure among this population. The machine learning algorithm which provided the best performance exhibited AUROC of 0.89 (95% CI = 0.88-0.90), sensitivity of 0.77 (95% CI = 0.75-0.78), specificity 0.85 (95% CI = 085-0.86). Validation performance across two separate health systems (comprising 899 COVID-19 patients) exhibited AUROC of 0.82 (0.81-0.83) and 0.89 (0.87, 0.90). Important features for prediction of ARDS included minimum oxygen saturation (SpO2), standard deviation of the systolic blood pressure (SBP), O2 flow, and maximum respiratory rate over an observational window of 16-hours. Analyzing the performance of the model across various cohorts indicates that the model performed best among a younger age group (18-40) (AUROC = 0.93 [0.92-0.94]), compared to an older age group (80+) (AUROC = 0.81 [0.81-0.82]). The model performance was comparable on both male and female groups, but performed significantly better on the severe ARDS group compared to the mild and moderate groups. The eARDS system demonstrated robust performance for predicting COVID19 patients who developed ARDS at least 12-hours before the Berlin clinical criteria, across two independent health systems.

Indexed as

COVID-19Machine LearningModels, BiologicalRespiratory Distress SyndromeAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCritical IllnessFemaleHumansMaleMedical Records Systems, ComputerizedMiddle AgedOxygenRespiratory RateOxygen

Identifiers

PMID34559819
PMCPMC8462682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.