Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34559672›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2021

Problems in Coordinating and Accessing Primary Care for Attached and Unattached Patients Exacerbated During the COVID-19 Pandemic Year (the PUPPY Study): Protocol for a Longitudinal Mixed Methods Study.

Emily Gard Marshall, Mylaine Breton, Benoit Cossette, Jennifer Isenor, Maria Mathews, Caitlyn Ayn, Mélanie Ann Smithman, David Stock, Eliot Frymire, Lynn Edwards and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Primary health care research & development · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Emily Gard MarshallPrimary Care Research Unit, Dalhousie Family Medicine, Halifax, NS, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8327-0329
Mylaine BretonDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5713-9618
Benoit CossetteDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1765-9130
Jennifer IsenorCollege of Pharmacy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1648-7362
Maria MathewsDepartment of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5174-104X
Caitlyn AynPrimary Care Research Unit, Dalhousie Family Medicine, Halifax, NS, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5114-2904
Mélanie Ann SmithmanDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2640-8701
David StockPrimary Care Research Unit, Dalhousie Family Medicine, Halifax, NS, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8150-4766
Eliot FrymireDepartment of Family Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4991-0622
Lynn EdwardsNova Scotia Health, Halifax, NS, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3019-4101
Michael GreenDepartment of Family Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5852-0143

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has significantly disrupted primary care in Canada, with many walk-in clinics and family practices initially closing or being perceived as inaccessible; pharmacies remaining open with restrictions on patient interactions; rapid uptake of virtual care; and reduced referrals for lab tests, diagnostics, and specialist care.

objectiveThe PUPPY Study (Problems in Coordinating and Accessing Primary Care for Attached and Unattached Patients Exacerbated During the COVID-19 Pandemic Year) seeks to understand the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic across the quadruple aims of primary care, with particular focus on the effects on patients without attachment to a regular provider and those with chronic health conditions.

methodsThe PUPPY study builds on an existing research program exploring patients' access and attachment to a primary care practice, pivoted to adapt to the emerging COVID-19 context. We intend to undertake a longitudinal mixed methods study to understand critical gaps in primary care access and coordination, as well as compare prepandemic and postpandemic data across 3 Canadian provinces (Quebec, Ontario, and Nova Scotia). Multiple data sources will be used such as a policy review; qualitative interviews with primary care policymakers, providers (ie, family physicians, nurse practitioners, and pharmacists), and patients (N=120); and medication prescriptions and health care billing data.

resultsThis study has received funding by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research COVID-19 Rapid Funding Opportunity Grant. Ethical approval to conduct this study was granted in Ontario (Queens Health Sciences & Affiliated Teaching Hospitals Research Ethics Board, file 6028052; Western University Health Sciences Research Ethics Board, project 116591; University of Toronto Health Sciences Research Ethics Board, protocol 40335) in November 2020, Québec (Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Estrie, project 2020-3446) in December 2020, and Nova Scotia (Nova Scotia Health Research Ethics Board, file 1024979) in August 2020.

conclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first study of its kind to explore the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on primary care systems, with particular focus on the issues of patient's attachment and access to primary care. Through a multistakeholder, cross-jurisdictional approach, the findings of the PUPPY study will inform the strengthening of primary care during and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as have implications for future policy and practice. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/29984.

Indexed as

accessCanadacoordinationCOVID-19health policyhealth services researchimpactlongitudinalmixed methods researchpolicyprimary careprotocolvirtual carevirtual health

Identifiers

PMID34559672
PMCPMC8516155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.