Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34559571›Full record

Trial reportJCO oncology practice2022

Randomized Prospective Trial Exploring the Impact of Structured Journaling in Patients With Sarcoma on the Management of Treatment-Related Adverse Events.

N J Speece, Menglin Xu, Gabriel Tinoco, David A Liebner, James L Chen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JCO oncology practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03258892 (Sarcoma Treatment Guide Pilot Study), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03258892 nacompletednot on this map

Sarcoma Treatment Guide Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorOhio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterRan2017 to 2020Enrolled64ConditionsSarcomaArmsEducational Intervention, Quality-of-Life Assessment, Survey Administration
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

N J SpeeceJames Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Menglin XuDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.ORCID 0000-0001-7895-0733
Gabriel TinocoDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.ORCID 0000-0003-0445-3907
David A LiebnerDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.ORCID 0000-0002-7657-4137
James L ChenDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.ORCID 0000-0002-4095-5202
The Ohio State University · USThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTreatment-related adverse events associated with systemic anticancer therapy (SACT) can deter patients with sarcoma from completing treatment. With self-monitoring, patients may be better empowered to self-advocate for improved symptom management. We hypothesized that by incorporating journaling, a structured form of self-monitoring, care team communication, and symptom management would improve. We thus designed a prospective randomized trial exploring journaling as a therapeutic adjuvant for symptom management (NCT03258892).

methodsParticipants with sarcoma initiating SACT were randomly assigned to receive either a symptom management journal at the start of SACT or after completing two cycles of SACT. Symptom journals were designed jointly by a cancer patient focus group and by education experts. Journals were reviewed with clinical staff at each visit. Participant responses were obtained through questionnaires. Patient call volume was obtained through the electronic health record.

resultsOf 64 participants consented for the trial, 53 were evaluable for analysis. Fifty-five percent of participants reported that the journal was at least moderately useful. These participants were more likely to report improved communication scores (

conclusionTo our knowledge, this is the first prospective randomized trial evaluating the use of structured journaling as a low-cost means to improve treatment-related adverse event management and QOL in patients with sarcoma undergoing SACT. These promising results will need to be confirmed by additional studies.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeSarcomaCommunicationHumansProspective StudiesSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID34559571
PMCPMC9213201
OpenAlexW3201500152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.