Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34559497›Full record

ArticleBiomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud2021

Chronic consumption of sweeteners in mice and its effect on the immune system and the small intestine microbiota

Jorge Alberto Escoto, Beatriz Elina Martínez-Carrillo, Ninfa Ramírez-Durán, Hugo Ramírez-Saad, José Félix Aguirre-Garrido, Roxana Valdés-Ramos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Ultra-processed foods and food additives in gut health and disease.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jorge Alberto EscotoInvestigación en Nutrición, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Toluca, Estado de México, México. biomedica@ins.gov.co.
Beatriz Elina Martínez-CarrilloInvestigación en Nutrición, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Toluca, Estado de México, México. martinez_elina9@hotmail.com.
Ninfa Ramírez-DuránMicrobiología Médica y Ambiental, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Toluca, Estado de México, México. biomedica@ins.gov.co.
Hugo Ramírez-SaadDepartamento de Sistemas Biológicos, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Xochimilco, Ciudad de México, México. biomedica@ins.gov.co.
José Félix Aguirre-GarridoBiotecnología Ambiental, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Lerma, Lerma, Estado de México, México. biomedica@ins.gov.co.
Roxana Valdés-RamosInvestigación en Nutrición, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Toluca, Estado de México, México. biomedica@ins.gov.co.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Sweeteners are additives used in different foods. They can be natural (sucrose and stevia) or artificial (sucralose). Currently, they are routinely consumed in multiple products and their effects on the mucosa of the small intestine and its microbiota are still controversial. Objective: To relate the consumption of sweeteners and their effect on the immune system and the microbiota of the small intestine in CD1 mice. Materials and methods: We used 54 three-week-old CD1 mice divided into three groups in the experiments: 1) A group of three weeks without treatment, 2) a group treated for six weeks, and 3) a group treated for 12 weeks using sucrose, sucralose, and stevia. We obtained CD19+ B lymphocytes, IgA+ antibodies, transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-b), and interleukins 12 and 17 (IL-12 and -17) from Peyer’s patches and lamina propria cells while DNA was obtained from intestinal solids to identify bacterial species. Results: After 12 weeks, sucrose and sucralose consumption caused a reduction in bacterial communities with an increase in CD19+, a decrease in IgA+ and TGF-b, and an increase in IL-12 and -17 in the Peyer’s patches while in the lamina propria there was an increase in all parameters. In contrast, stevia led to an improvement in bacterial diversity and percentage of CD19+ lymphocytes with minimal increase in IgA+, TGF-b, and IL-12, and a decrease in IL-17. Conclusion: Sucrose and sucralose caused negative alterations in bacterial diversity and immune parameters after 12 weeks; in contrast, stevia was beneficial for the intestinal mucosa.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaSweetening AgentsAnimalsB-LymphocytesIntestinal MucosaIntestine, SmallMiceSweetening Agents

Identifiers

PMID34559497
PMCPMC8519602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.