Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34559429›Full record

ArticleProteins2021

Assessment of prediction methods for protein structures determined by NMR in CASP14: Impact of AlphaFold2.

Yuanpeng Janet Huang, Ning Zhang, Beate Bersch, Krzysztof Fidelis, Masayori Inouye, Yojiro Ishida, Andriy Kryshtafovych, Naohiro Kobayashi, Yutaka Kuroda, Gaohua Liu and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteins, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Blind assessment of monomeric AlphaFold2 protein structure models with experimental NMR data.Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Yuanpeng Janet HuangDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Center for Biotechnology and Interdisciplinary Sciences, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3374-786X
Ning ZhangDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Merced, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3590-3774
Beate BerschBiomolecular NMR Spectroscopy Group, Institut de Biologie Structurale, UMD-5075, CNRS-CEA-UJF, Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1138-4911
Krzysztof FidelisGenome Center, University of California, Davis, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8061-412X
Masayori InouyeDepartment of Biochemistry, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4490-600X
Yojiro IshidaDepartment of Biochemistry, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6781-367X
Andriy KryshtafovychGenome Center, University of California, Davis, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5066-7178
Naohiro KobayashiNMR Science and Development Division, RSC, RIKEN, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5136-2077
Yutaka KurodaDepartment of Biotechnology and Life Science, Graduate School of Engineering, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology (TUAT), Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3221-4295
Gaohua LiuNexomics Biosciences, Inc., Rocky Hill, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4343-0356
Andy LiWangDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Merced, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4741-6946
G V T SwapnaDepartment of Pharmacology, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9342-2525
Nan WuCollege of Food and Bioengineering, Zhengzhou University of Light Industry, Zhengzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2274-4900
Toshio YamazakiNMR Science and Development Division, RSC, RIKEN, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4719-0828
Gaetano T MontelioneDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Center for Biotechnology and Interdisciplinary Sciences, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9440-3059
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USRensselaer Polytechnic Institute · USRIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences · JPUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of California, Merced · USCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRNĒRx BioSciences (United States) · USTokyo University of Technology · JPZhengzhou University of Light Industry · CN

Funding

Prospective analysis to determine model accuracy performance and boundaries in the post-AlphaFold2 environmentR01GM100482 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI FIDELIS, KRZYSZTOF A · 2012 to 2025
$11.1M
Hybrid Methods for Dynamic Structure Analysis of Proteins from Pathogenic MicroorganismsR35GM141818 · NIGMS · RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE · PI MONTELIONE, GAETANO T · 2021 to 2025
$3.3M
Membrane Protein Structure Using Evolutionary Couplings and Sparse NMR DataR01GM120574 · NIGMS · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI MONTELIONE, GAETANO T · 2017 to 2020
$2.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM100482NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM120574NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM141818
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

NMR studies can provide unique information about protein conformations in solution. In CASP14, three reference structures provided by solution NMR methods were available (T1027, T1029, and T1055), as well as a fourth data set of NMR-derived contacts for an integral membrane protein (T1088). For the three targets with NMR-based structures, the best prediction results ranged from very good (GDT_TS = 0.90, for T1055) to poor (GDT_TS = 0.47, for T1029). We explored the basis of these results by comparing all CASP14 prediction models against experimental NMR data. For T1027, NMR data reveal extensive internal dynamics, presenting a unique challenge for protein structure prediction methods. The analysis of T1029 motivated exploration of a novel method of "inverse structure determination," in which an AlphaFold2 model was used to guide NMR data analysis. NMR data provided to CASP predictor groups for target T1088, a 238-residue integral membrane porin, was also used to assess several NMR-assisted prediction methods. Most groups involved in this exercise generated similar beta-barrel models, with good agreement with the experimental data. However, as was also observed in CASP13, some pure prediction groups that did not use any NMR data generated models for T1088 that better fit the NMR data than the models generated using these experimental data. These results demonstrate the remarkable power of modern methods to predict structures of proteins with accuracies rivaling solution NMR structures, and that it is now possible to reliably use prediction models to guide and complement experimental NMR data analysis.

Indexed as

Membrane ProteinsModels, MolecularProtein ConformationSoftwareComputational BiologyMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyProtein FoldingSequence Analysis, ProteinMembrane Proteinsintegral membrane proteinsmachine leaningMipAprotein dynamicsprotein structure predictionsolution NMRstructure determination

Identifiers

PMID34559429
PMCPMC8616817
OpenAlexW3199246256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.