Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34559402›Full record

SynthesisJournal of endocrinological investigation2022

Social environmental impact of COVID-19 and erectile dysfunction: an explorative review.

D Pizzol, J I Shin, M Trott, P-C Ilie, S Ippoliti, A M Carrie, R A Ghayda, J M O Lozano, J M Muyor, L Butler and 9 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of endocrinological investigation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The Impact of Loosening COVID-19 Restrictions and Live-in Partner Status on Sexual and Mental Health in a Canadian Sample.International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 12 institutions in 8 countries.

D PizzolItalian Agency for Development Cooperation, 33 Street, Amarat, Khartoum, Sudan. damianopizzol8@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4122-0774
J I ShinDepartment of Pediatrics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
M TrottVision and Eye Research Institute, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.
P-C IlieUrology Department, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital King's Lynn, King's Lynn, UK.
S IppolitiUrology Department, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital King's Lynn, King's Lynn, UK.
A M CarrieUrology Department, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital King's Lynn, King's Lynn, UK.
R A GhaydaUrology Institute, University Hospitals, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
J M O LozanoHealth Research Centre, University Almeria, Almeria, Spain.
J M MuyorHealth Research Centre, University Almeria, Almeria, Spain.
L ButlerFaculty of Science and Engineering, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.
D T McDermottNTU Psychology, School of Social Science, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK.
Y BarnettFaculty of Science and Engineering, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.
L MarkovicDepartment of Physical Medicine, Rehabilitation and Occupational Medicine, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Igor GrabovacDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, Centre for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
A KoyanagiResearch and Development Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Spain.
P SoysalDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, Turkey.
M A TullySchool of Health Sciences, Institute of Nursing and Health Research, Jordans Town, Northern Ireland, UK.
N VeroneseGeriatrics Section, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
L SmithThe Cambridge Centre for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.
Anglia Ruskin University · GBQueen Elizabeth Hospital King's Lynn NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Almería · ESBezmiâlem Vakıf Üniversitesi · TRInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats · ESMedical University of Vienna · ATNorwegian Agency for Development Cooperation · NONottingham Trent University · GBUniversity Hospitals of Cleveland · USUniversity of Palermo · ITVienna General Hospital · ATYonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo date, no attempt has been made to collate literature on the relationship between the social environmental impact of COVID-19 and erectile dysfunction. The aim of this explorative review was to assess and compare the prevalence of erectile dysfunction (ED) in male healthcare workers and males during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsA systematic review of major databases from inception to February 2021 was conducted. Prevalence data were extracted, and a random-effects meta-analysis was undertaken. OUTCOMES: The pooled prevalence of ED amongst healthcare workers working in COVID-19 specific environments, and non-healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic.

resultsOf 52 initial studies, six were included for the final analysis. The pooled prevalence of ED in healthcare workers working in a COVID-19 environment was 63.6% (95% CI 20.3-92.3%), and in non-healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic was 31.9% (95% CI 19.5-47.6%).

conclusionThe prevalence of ED in healthcare workers working in COVID-19 environments was higher than representative samples and is of concern. Sexual health (and by extension, overall health), should be a priority when considering ways to care for this population. Considering the social environmental impact of COVID-19 on sexual health and in particular on ED, it is important to provide adequate psychological support systems and to promote quality of life with particular attention to sexual health.

Indexed as

SARS-CoV-2Social EnvironmentAdolescentAdultCOVID-19Erectile DysfunctionHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultCOVID-19Erectile dysfunctionPrevalenceSexual health

Identifiers

PMID34559402
PMCPMC8461150
OpenAlexW3199896495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.