Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34559383›Full record

SynthesisEndocrine pathology2021

Primary Versus Secondary Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma: Perspectives from Multi-institutional and Population-Level Data.

Tam N M Ngo, Trang T B Le, Thoa Le, Andrey Bychkov, Naoki Oishi, Chan Kwon Jung, Lewis Hassell, Kennichi Kakudo, Huy Gia Vuong

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Endocrine pathology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. NF-κB in Thyroid Cancer: An Update.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  5. Aggressive Types of Malignant Thyroid Neoplasms.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Asian Thyroid Working Group, from 2017 to 2023.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Tam N M Ngo *Faculty of Medicine, Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine, Ho Chi Minh City, 700-000, Vietnam.
Trang T B Le *Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, 700-000, Vietnam.
Thoa LeFaculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, 700-000, Vietnam.
Andrey BychkovDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Naoki OishiDepartment of Pathology, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Yamanashi, 409-3898, Japan.
Chan Kwon JungDepartment of Hospital Pathology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Lewis HassellDepartment of Pathology, Oklahoma University Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA.
Kennichi KakudoDepartment of Pathology and Thyroid Disease Center, Izumi City General Hospital, Wake-cho 4-5-1, Izumi-city, 594-0073, Japan.
Huy Gia VuongDepartment of Pathology, Oklahoma University Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA. giahuy-vuong@ouhsc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6213-765X
University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City · VNCatholic University of Korea · KRChulalongkorn University · THIzumi City General Hospital · JPOklahoma City University · USOU HealthPham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine · VNUniversity of Yamanashi · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary (or de novo) anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) is ATC without pre-existing history of differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) and no co-existing DTC foci at the time of diagnosis. Secondary ATC is diagnosed if the patient had a history of DTC or co-existing DTC components at time of diagnosis. This study aimed to investigate the incidence, clinical presentations, outcomes, and genetic backgrounds of primary versus secondary ATCs. We searched for ATCs in our institutional databases and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result (SEER) database. We also performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to analyze the genetic alterations of primary and secondary ATCs. From our multi-institutional database, 22 primary and 23 secondary ATCs were retrieved. We also identified 620 and 24 primary and secondary ATCs in the SEER database, respectively. Compared to primary ATCs, secondary ATCs were not statistically different in terms of demographic, clinical manifestations, and patient survival. The only clinical discrepancy between the two groups was a significantly larger tumor diameter of the primary ATCs. The prevalence of TERT promoter, PIK3CA, and TP53 mutations was comparable between the two subtypes. In comparison to primary ATCs, however, BRAF mutations were more prevalent (OR = 4.70; 95% CI = 2.84-7.78) whereas RAS mutations were less frequent (OR = 0.43; 95% CI = 0.21-0.85) in secondary tumors. In summary, our results indicated that de novo and secondary ATCs might share many potential developmental steps, but there are other factors that suggest distinct developmental pathways.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedThyroid Carcinoma, AnaplasticThyroid NeoplasmsAnaplasticDe novoPrimarySecondaryThyroidTransformationUndifferentiated

Identifiers

PMID34559383
OpenAlexW3200791755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.