Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34559354›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2021

Determinants of use of oral complementary-alternative medicine among women with early breast cancer: a focus on cancer-related fatigue.

Pietro Lapidari, Nardjes Djehal, Julie Havas, Arnauld Gbenou, Elise Martin, Cecile Charles, Sarah Dauchy, Barbara Pistilli, Claire Cadeau, Aurélie Bertaut and 10 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01993498 (A Prospective Cohort to Investigate Survivorship Issues in Patients With Early Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01993498 narecruitingnot on this map

A Prospective Cohort to Investigate Survivorship Issues in Patients With Early Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorUNICANCERRan2012 to 2034Enrolled14,750ConditionsBreast Cancer Nos Metastatic Recurrent, Early Lung CancerArmsblood sampling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

Pietro LapidariMolecular Predictors and New Targets in Oncology, INSERM Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Nardjes DjehalMedical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Julie HavasMolecular Predictors and New Targets in Oncology, INSERM Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Arnauld GbenouMolecular Predictors and New Targets in Oncology, INSERM Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Elise MartinMolecular Predictors and New Targets in Oncology, INSERM Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Cecile CharlesBordeaux Public Health, Université de Bordeaux, U1219, Bordeaux, France.
Sarah DauchyDépartement Interdisciplinaire de Soins de Support aux Patients en Onco-hématologie, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Barbara PistilliMedical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Claire CadeauHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Aurélie BertautCentre Georges-François Leclerc, Methodology and Biostatistic Unit, Dijon, France.
Sibille EverhardUnicancer, Paris, France.
Anne-Laure MartinUnicancer, Paris, France.
Charles CoutantMedical Oncology, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Paul CottuMedical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Gwenn MenvielleInstitut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Paris, France.
Agnes DumasECEVE UMR 1123, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Fabrice AndreMolecular Predictors and New Targets in Oncology, INSERM Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Stefan MichielsService de Biostatistique et d'Epidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Ines Vaz-LuisMolecular Predictors and New Targets in Oncology, INSERM Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Antonio Di MeglioMolecular Predictors and New Targets in Oncology, INSERM Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France. Antonio.DI-MEGLIO@gustaveroussy.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0233-3189
Inserm · FRInstitut Gustave Roussy · FRCentre Georges François Leclerc · FRUniCancer Group · FRHarvard University · USInstitut Curie · FRInstitut Pierre Louis d‘Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique · FRUniversité de Bordeaux · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-10-COHO-0004Conquer Cancer Foundation Career pathway grant in symptom managementSusan G. Komen CCR17483507
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the questionable effectiveness of oral complementary and alternative medicine (OCAM) in relieving cancer-related symptoms, including fatigue (CRF), many patients use it aiming to improve their quality of life. We assessed factors associated with OCAM use, focusing on CRF.

methodsWomen with stage I-III breast cancer (BC) were included from CANTO (NCT01993498). OCAM use was defined as taking homeopathy, vitamins/minerals, or herbal/dietary supplements. Multivariable multinomial logistic regressions evaluated associations of CRF (EORTC QLQ-C30), patient, and treatment characteristics with OCAM use.

resultsAmong 5237 women, 23.0% reported OCAM use overall (49.3% at diagnosis, 50.7% starting post-diagnosis), mostly homeopathy (65.4%). Mean (SD) CRF score was 27.6 (24.0) at diagnosis and 35.1 (25.3) at post-diagnosis. More intense CRF was consistently associated with OCAM use at diagnosis and post-diagnosis [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for 10-point increase 1.05 (95% Confidence interval 1.01-1.09) and 1.04 (1.01-1.09) vs. never use, respectively]. Odds of using OCAM at diagnosis were higher among older [for 5-year increase, 1.09 (1.04-1.14)] and more educated patients [college vs. primary 1.80 (1.27-2.55)]. Women with income > 3000 [vs. < 1500 euros/month, 1.44 (1.02-2.03)], anxiety [vs. not, 1.25 (1.01-1.54)], and those receiving chemotherapy [vs. not, 1.32 (1.04-1.68)] had higher odds of using OCAM post-diagnosis.

conclusionOne-in-four patients reported use of OCAM. More severe CRF was consistently associated with its use. Moreover, older, better educated, wealthier, more anxious women, and those receiving chemotherapy seemed more prone to use OCAM. Characterizing profiles of BC patients more frequently resorting to OCAM may help deliver targeted information about its benefits and potential risks.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsComplementary TherapiesFatigueFemaleHumansQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesCancer-related fatigueCohort studyComplementary and alternative medicineEarly breast cancerSurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID34559354
OpenAlexW3199414159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.