ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2021
Can only one physiological trait determinate the adverse effect of green fluorescent protein (GFP) incorporation on Vibrio virulence?
Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and Characterization of Fluorescent Protein-TaggedPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Enterogenic Stenotrophomonas maltophilia migrates to the mammary gland to induce mastitis by activating the calcium-ROS-AMPK-mTOR-autophagy pathway.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Green fluorescent protein (GFP) has been used extensively for in situ animal studies that follow up bacterial infection under epifluorescence microscopy. It is assumed that GFP is acting as a "neutral" protein with no influence on the bacterial physiology. To verify this hypothesis, the virulence of Vibrio splendidus ME9, Vibrio anguillarum NB10, and their respective GFP-tagged strains ME9-GFP and NB10-GFP (transconjugants) was compared in vitro and tested in vivo towards blue mussel (Mytilus edulis) larvae. Results showed that the incorporation of GFP negatively impacted the growth and swimming motility of NB10 in vitro. Correspondingly, the mRNA levels of genes involved in bacterial swimming motility (flaA, flaE, and cheR) were significantly down-regulated in NB10-GFP. As for the strain ME9 on the other hand, GFP incorporation only had a negative effect on swimming motility. However, both the strains NB10-GFP and ME9-GFP showed almost the same virulence as their respective parental strain towards mussel larvae in vivo. Overall, the data presented here demonstrated that incorporation of GFP may cause modifications in cell physiology and highlight the importance of preliminary physiological tests to minimize the negative influence of GFP tagging when it is used to monitor the target localization. The study also supports the idea that the virulence of Vibrio species is determined by complex regulatory networks. Notwithstanding the change of a single physiological trait, especially growth or swimming motility, the GFP-tagged Vibrio strain can thus still be considered usable in studies mainly focusing on the virulence of the strain. KEY POINTS: • The effect of GFP incorporation on physiological trait of Vibrio strains. • The virulence in vibrios could be multifactorial. • The stable virulence of Vibrio strains after GFP incorporation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.