Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34559252›Full record

ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2021

[Adherence to digital health interventions: definitions, methods, and open questions].

Sven Kernebeck, Theresa Sophie Busse, Jan Peter Ehlers, Horst Christian Vollmar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. E-Mental Health Interventions in Inpatient Care: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. [Digital Healthcare: Requirements for a Successful Transformation].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sven KernebeckLehrstuhl für Didaktik und Bildungsforschung im Gesundheitswesen, Fakultät für Gesundheit, Universität Witten/Herdecke, Pferdebachstraße 11, 58448, Witten, Deutschland. sven.kernebeck@uni-wh.de.
Theresa Sophie BusseLehrstuhl für Didaktik und Bildungsforschung im Gesundheitswesen, Fakultät für Gesundheit, Universität Witten/Herdecke, Pferdebachstraße 11, 58448, Witten, Deutschland.
Jan Peter EhlersLehrstuhl für Didaktik und Bildungsforschung im Gesundheitswesen, Fakultät für Gesundheit, Universität Witten/Herdecke, Pferdebachstraße 11, 58448, Witten, Deutschland.
Horst Christian VollmarMedizinische Fakultät, Abteilung für Allgemeinmedizin, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many digital interventions rely on the participation of their users to have a positive impact. In various areas it can be observed that the use of digital interventions is often reduced or fully discontinued by the users after a short period of time. This is seen as one of the main factors that can limit the effectiveness of digital interventions. In this context, the concept of adherence to digital interventions is becoming increasingly important. Adherence to digital interventions is roughly defined as "the degree to which the user followed the program as it was designed," which can also be paraphrased as "intended use" or "use as it is designed." However, both the theoretical-conceptual and practical discussions regarding adherence to digital interventions still receive too little attention.The aim of this narrative review article is to shed more light on the concept of adherence to digital interventions and to distinguish it from related concepts. It also discusses the methods and metrics that can be used to operationalize adherence and the predictors that positively influence adherence. Finally, needs for action to better address adherence are considered critically.

Indexed as

TelemedicineGermanyAdherenceDigital health appsDigital interventionsEffectivenessE‑HealthM‑Health

Identifiers

PMID34559252
PMCPMC8492574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.