Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34559185›Full record

Trial reportTranslational vision science & technology2021

Integrating Clinical Data and Tear Proteomics to Assess Efficacy, Ocular Surface Status, and Biomarker Response After Orthokeratology Lens Wear.

Jimmy S H Tse, Jimmy K W Cheung, Gigi T K Wong, Thomas C Lam, Kai Yip Choi, Katherine H Y So, Christie D M Lam, Andes Y H Sze, Angel C K Wong, Gigi M C Yee and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Translational vision science & technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Grading Scales of Conjunctival Inflammation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  3. Ocular tear fluid biomarkers collected by contact lenses.Biochemical and biophysical research communications · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jimmy S H TseCentre for Myopia Research, School of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.
Jimmy K W CheungCentre for Myopia Research, School of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.
Gigi T K WongCentre for Myopia Research, School of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.
Thomas C LamCentre for Myopia Research, School of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.
Kai Yip ChoiCentre for Myopia Research, School of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.
Katherine H Y SoCentre for Myopia Research, School of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.
Christie D M LamCentre for Myopia Research, School of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.
Andes Y H SzeCentre for Myopia Research, School of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.
Angel C K WongCentre for Myopia Research, School of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.
Gigi M C YeeCentre for Myopia Research, School of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.
Henry H L ChanCentre for Myopia Research, School of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.
Hong Kong Polytechnic University · HKShenzhen Polytechnic · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated the efficacy and ocular surface status of Breath-O Correct, novel orthokeratology (OK) lenses, worn overnight for 3 months. Lens-induced changes in the tear proteome were evaluated. Methods: Thirty-one subjects, aged 19 to 26 years with refractive error from -1.00 to -5.00 D, were randomly assigned 1:1 to the treatment or control group. Refraction, visual acuity, corneal integrity, biomechanics and endothelial health, ocular surface changes, and subjective symptoms were assessed at the baseline, one-month, and three-month visits. The tear proteome was characterized over time using sequential window acquisition of all theoretical ion spectra mass spectrometry. Results: Lenses improved uncorrected visual acuity and reduced spherical powers with similar efficacy to other OK lenses. Significant reductions (P < 0.05) in corneal hysteresis (11.12 ± 1.12 to 10.38 ± 1.36 mm Hg) and corneal resistance factor (11.06 ± 1.32 to 9.90 ± 1.45 mm Hg) were observed in the treatment group after one month of lens wear, whereas other assessed factors remained unchanged. Thirteen and eight differentially expressed proteins were found after one month and three months of lens wear, respectively. Two proteins (proline-rich protein 27 and immunoglobulin V regions) were differentially expressed at both visits. Conclusions: Over a three-month period, Breath-O Correct lenses were overall safe, well tolerated, efficacious in refractive power reduction, and comparable with other OK lenses. Furthermore, their use caused only minor noninflammatory protein expression changes in the tear proteome. Translational Relevance: This study investigated the safety of orthokeratology contact lenses on the ocular surface in molecular aspects and standard clinical parameters.

Indexed as

MyopiaProteomicsAdultBiomarkersCorneal TopographyHumansRefraction, OcularYoung AdultBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID34559185
PMCPMC8475286
OpenAlexW3199388485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.