Observational studyMedicine2021
Afterload-related cardiac performance predicts prognosis in critical ill patients with sepsis: A prospective observational pilot study.
Observational study in Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sepsis and the Heart: In the Quest for Noninvasive Pressure-Volume Loops at the Bedside.Critical care explorations · 2025Article
- [Septic cardiomyopathy-diagnosis and estimation of disease severity].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractTo investigate the usefulness of afterload-related cardiac performance (ACP) for assessing cardiac impairment and predicting prognosis in septic patients.Adult patients with sepsis in the intensive care unit were included. Cardiac output, cardiac index, cardiac power index, and ACP were calculated at the time of admission (D0) and 48-72 h after admission (D3). They were correlated with Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and sequential organ failure assessment scores, then the prognostic values were analyzed.A total of 41 patients with sepsis were selected. ACP showed a stronger negative correlation with Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and sequential organ failure assessment scores than cardiac output, cardiac index, and cardiac power index. ACP predicted 28-day mortality with an area under the curve of 0.775 and 0.976 on D0 and D3, respectively. In addition, most non-survivors had emergent cardiac impairment (ACP ≤ 80%) on D0, and cardiac function was deteriorated on D3. Survival analysis showed that the patients with a decreased ACP from D0 to D3 had the highest mortality. The decrease of ACP on D3 was an independent risk factor for mortality (hazard ratio, 11.89; P = .0028).ACP can be used to assess the severity of cardiac impairment in sepsis. Continued decline of ACP during the first 3 days strongly suggests a poor prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.