ArticleMedicine2021
The effectiveness and safety of Chuna manual therapy adjuvant to Western medicine in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Study protocol for a randomized, single-blind, investigator-initiated, pilot trial.
Article in Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of selective manual therapy techniques in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A randomized control trial.Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2024Article
- The Effectiveness and Safety of Chuna Manual Therapy Adjuvant to Western Medicine in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Investigator-Initiated, Pilot Trial.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management, greater emphasis has been placed on symptomatic improvement and enhanced quality of life in patients. Manual therapy among respiratory rehabilitation programs has received much attention recently, with the publication of numerous studies. In South Korea, a method known as Chuna Manual Therapy (CMT) has been applied in the management of COPD patients and in clinical practice, but the clinical basis for safety and effectiveness is yet to be established. Therefore, rigorously designed randomized controlled trials are required. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of assessing the add-on effect and safety of CMT administered with standard Western medicine therapy for the treatment of COPD.
methodsThis is a randomized, single-blind, single-center clinical pilot trial. Patients with COPD receiving standard drug therapy are randomly divided into an experimental group (n = 20) and a control group (n = 20) at a 1:1 ratio. The experimental group receives CMT adding to the standard medical therapy once a week for 8 weeks. The control group receives only the standard drug treatment. The trial is conducted with an outcome assessor and statistician blinding. The primary outcome is the 6-minute walk test. The secondary outcomes include the pulmonary function test, the Modified Medical Research Council, visual analog scale for dyspnea, COPD assessment test, quality of life using the St. George's respiratory questionnaire, EuroQOL five dimensions questionnaire, and Korean pattern identification questionnaire. Adverse events are also be evaluated.
conclusionsThe results of this study will provide the feasibility of a large-scale clinical trial to establish high-quality clinical evidence of CMT for COPD.
trial registrationKorean Clinical Trial Registry (http://cris.nih.go.kr; registration number: KCT0006119).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.