Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34559059›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2021

Longitudinal Neurocognitive and Pulmonological Profile of Long COVID-19: Protocol for the COVIMMUNE-Clin Study.

Catherine N Widmann, Michelle Wieberneit, Luzie Bieler, Sarah Bernsen, Robin Gräfenkämper, Frederic Brosseron, Carsten Schmeel, Pawel Tacik, Dirk Skowasch, Alexander Radbruch and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Long-COVID and postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome: a preliminary comparison of neuropsychological performance.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Catherine N WidmannSection Neuropsychology, Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Gerontopsychiatry, University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8889-8385
Michelle WieberneitSection Neuropsychology, Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Gerontopsychiatry, University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2935-3446
Luzie BielerSection Neuropsychology, Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Gerontopsychiatry, University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1216-6046
Sarah BernsenGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7485-2626
Robin GräfenkämperSection Neuropsychology, Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Gerontopsychiatry, University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9649-8373
Frederic BrosseronGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3137-7516
Carsten SchmeelDepartment of Neuroradiology, University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0985-1517
Pawel TacikGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4234-5635
Dirk SkowaschDepartment of Cardiology, Pneumology and Angiology, Internal Medicine II, University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2377-5936
Alexander RadbruchDepartment of Neuroradiology, University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6238-6525
Michael T HenekaGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4996-1630
University of Bonn · DEGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a dearth of information about "brain fog," characterized by concentration, word-finding, or memory problems, which has been listed in the new World Health Organization provisional classification "U09.9 Post-COVID-19 Condition." Moreover, the extent to which these symptoms may be associated with neurological, pulmonary, or psychiatric difficulties is unclear.

objectiveThis ongoing cohort study aims to carefully assess neurocognitive function in the context of the neurological, psychiatric, and pulmonary sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection among patients with asymptomatic/mild and severe cases of COVID-19 after remission, including actively recruited healthy controls.

methodsA total of 150 participants will be included in this pilot study. The cohort will comprise patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection with either an asymptomatic course or a mild course defined as no symptoms except for olfactory and taste dysfunction (n=50), patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection with a severe disease course (n=50), and a healthy control group (n=50) with similar age and sex distribution based on frequency matching. A comprehensive neuropsychological assessment will be performed comprising nuanced aspects of complex attention, including language, executive function, verbal and visual learning, and memory. Psychiatric, personality, social and lifestyle factors, sleep, and fatigue will be evaluated. Brain magnetic resonance imaging, neurological and physical assessment, and pulmonological and lung function examinations (including body plethysmography, diffusion capacity, clinical assessments, and questionnaires) will also be performed. Three visits are planned with comprehensive testing at the baseline and 12-month visits, along with brief neurological and neuropsychological examinations at the 6-month assessment. Blood-based biomarkers of neurodegeneration will be quantified at baseline and 12-month follow-up.

resultsAt the time of submission, the study had begun recruitment through telephone and in-person screenings. The first patient was enrolled in the study at the beginning of April 2021. Interim data analysis of baseline information is expected to be complete by December 2021 and study completion is expected at the end of December 2022. Preliminary group comparisons indicate worse word list learning, short- and long-delayed verbal recall, and verbal recognition in both patient cohorts compared with those of the healthy control group, adjusted for age and sex. Initial volumetric comparisons show smaller grey matter, frontal, and temporal brain volumes in both patient groups compared with those of healthy controls. These results are quite robust but are neither final nor placed in the needed context intended at study completion.

conclusionsTo the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to include objective and comprehensive longitudinal analyses of neurocognitive sequelae of COVID-19 in an extreme group comparison stratified by disease severity with healthy controls actively recruited during the pandemic. Results from this study will contribute to the nascent literature on the prolonged effects of COVID-19 on neurocognitive performance via our coassessment of neuroradiological, neurological, pulmonary, psychiatric, and lifestyle factors.

trial registrationInternational Clinical Trials Registry Platform DRKS00023806; https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=DRKS00023806. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/30259.

Indexed as

cognitionCOVID-19lungmagnetic resonance imagingneuropsychologypostacute COVID-19 syndromeSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34559059
PMCPMC8589042
OpenAlexW3198908217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.