Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34558751›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology2021

Social groups constrain the spatiotemporal dynamics of wild sifaka gut microbiomes.

Amanda C Perofsky, Lauren Ancel Meyers, Laura A Abondano, Anthony Di Fiore, Rebecca J Lewis

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Ecology and evolution of the social microbiome.Annual review of ecology, evolution, and systematics · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Gut Microbiome Profiling of the Endangered Southern Greater Glider (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amanda C PerofskyDepartment of Integrative Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7341-9193
Lauren Ancel MeyersDepartment of Integrative Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.
Laura A AbondanoDepartment of Anthropology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.
Anthony Di FioreDepartment of Anthropology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.
Rebecca J LewisDepartment of Anthropology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.
The University of Texas at Austin · USSanta Fe Institute · US

Funding

Impacts of Individual and Social Behavior on Influenza Dynamics and ControlU01GM087719 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GALVANI, ALISON P, MEYERS, LAUREN ANCEL · 2009 to 2018
$6.3M
Accelerating viral outbreak detection in US cities using mechanistic models, machine learning and diverse geospatial dataR01AI151176 · NIAID · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GALVANI, ALISON P, MEYERS, LAUREN ANCEL · 2020 to 2024
$3.9M
American Society of PrimatologistsCampbell FoundationDivision of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences BCS-1719655Division of Environmental Biology DEB-0749097Division of Graduate EducationInternational Primatological SocietyLeakey FoundationMargot Marsh Biodiversity FoundationNIAID NIH HHS R01 AI151176NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM087719NIGMS NIH HHS U01GM087719-01NSF Beacon Study of Evolution in Action DBI-0939454Primate ConservationUniversity of Texas at Austin
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primates acquire gut microbiota from conspecifics through direct social contact and shared environmental exposures. Host behaviour is a prominent force in structuring gut microbial communities, yet the extent to which group or individual-level forces shape the long-term dynamics of gut microbiota is poorly understood. We investigated the effects of three aspects of host sociality (social groupings, dyadic interactions, and individual dispersal between groups) on gut microbiome composition and plasticity in 58 wild Verreaux's sifaka (Propithecus verreauxi) from six social groups. Over the course of three dry seasons in a 5-year period, the six social groups maintained distinct gut microbial signatures, with the taxonomic composition of individual communities changing in tandem among coresiding group members. Samples collected from group members during each season were more similar than samples collected from single individuals across different years. In addition, new immigrants and individuals with less stable social ties exhibited elevated rates of microbiome turnover across seasons. Our results suggest that permanent social groupings shape the changing composition of commensal and mutualistic gut microbial communities and thus may be important drivers of health and resilience in wild primate populations.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeStrepsirhiniAnimalsSeasonsSocial Behaviorgut microbiomelemurlongitudinal surveyMadagascarprimatesocial network

Identifiers

PMID34558751
PMCPMC8665069
OpenAlexW3199891132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.