Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34558617›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2021

Potential use of ground brown rice for weanling pigs.

Jeong Jae Lee, Sheena Kim, Jin Ho Cho, Hyunjin Kyoung, Seonmin Lee, Jeehwan Choe, Yanhong Liu, Peng Ji, Xia Xiong, Younghoon Kim and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jeong Jae LeeInstitute of Agricultural Science and Technology, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea.
Sheena KimDepartment of Animal Resources Science, Dankook University, Cheonan 31116, Korea.
Jin Ho ChoDivision of Food and Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea.
Hyunjin KyoungDivision of Animal and Dairy Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.
Seonmin LeeDivision of Animal and Dairy Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.
Jeehwan ChoeDepartment of Beef Science, Korea National College of Agriculture and Fisheries, Jeonju 54874, Korea.
Yanhong LiuDepartment of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Peng JiDepartment of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7447-5688
Xia XiongKey Laboratory of Agro-ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Laboratory of Animal Nutritional Physiology and Metabolic Process, Hunan Provincial Engineering Research Center of Healthy Livestock, Scientific Observing and Experimental Station of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science in South-Central, Ministry of Agriculture, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, Hunan 410125, China.
Younghoon KimDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea.
Hyeun Bum KimDepartment of Animal Resources Science, Dankook University, Cheonan 31116, Korea.
Minho SongDivision of Animal and Dairy Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2021R1I1A3046876
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of the current study was to assess the effects of substituting corn with ground brown rice on growth performance, immune status, and gut microbiota in weanling pigs. Seventy-two weanling pigs (28 d old with 6.78 ± 0.94 kg body weight [BW]) were randomly allotted to two dietary treatments with six pens and six pigs (three barrows and gilts) per pen within a randomized complete block design. The control pigs were fed a typical diet for weanling pigs based on corn and soybean meal diet (control diet: CON), and the other pigs were fed a formulated diet with 100% replacement of corn with ground brown rice for 35d (treatment diet: GBR). Growth performance, immune status, and gut microbiota of weanling pigs were measured. The substitution of corn with GBR did not affect growth performance or diarrhea frequency. Additionally, there were no differences in white blood cell number, hematocrit, cortisol, C-reactive protein, and serum tumor necrosis factor-alpha levels between pigs fed CON or GBR for the first 2 wk after weaning. However, weanling pigs fed GBR had lower (P < 0.05) serum transforming growth factor-beta 1 level than those fed CON. Furthermore, weanling pigs fed GBR had increased (P < 0.05) relative abundance of phylum Firmicutes and genus Lactobacillus and Streptococcus and decreased (P < 0.05) relative abundance of phylum Bacteroidetes and genus Clostridium and Prevotella in the gut microbiota compared with those fed CON. In conclusion, there was no significant difference in growth performance when corn was replaced with ground brown rice in diets for weanling pigs. Furthermore, the substitution of corn with ground brown rice in weaning diet modulated immune status and gut microbiota of pigs by increasing beneficial microbial communities and reducing harmful microbial communities. Overall, ground brown rice-based diet is a potential alternative to corn-based diet without negative effects on growth performance, immune status, and gut microbiota changes of weanling pigs.

Indexed as

Animal FeedOryzaAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsDietGlycine maxRandom AllocationSus scrofaSwineWeaningground brown ricegrowth performancegut microbiotaimmune statusweanling pigs

Identifiers

PMID34558617
PMCPMC8525501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.