Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34558614›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2021

Purebred-crossbred genetic parameters for reproductive traits in swine.

Luke M Kramer, Anna Wolc, Hadi Esfandyari, Dinesh M Thekkoot, Chunyan Zhang, Robert A Kemp, Graham Plastow, Jack C M Dekkers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Unravelling the Genetic Mechanisms of Litter Traits in a Maternal Line of Pigs.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Luke M KramerDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames IA 50011, USA.
Anna WolcDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames IA 50011, USA.
Hadi EsfandyariDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames IA 50011, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1570-6271
Dinesh M ThekkootGenesus Inc., Oakville, MB, R0H 0Y0, Canada.
Chunyan ZhangGenesus Inc., Oakville, MB, R0H 0Y0, Canada.
Robert A KempGenesus Inc., Oakville, MB, R0H 0Y0, Canada.
Graham PlastowDepartment of Agricultural, Food, and Nutritional Science, Livestock Gentec, University of Alberta, Edmonton AB, T6G 2P5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3774-3110
Jack C M DekkersDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames IA 50011, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For swine breeding programs, testing and selection programs are usually within purebred (PB) populations located in nucleus units that are generally managed differently and tend to have a higher health level than the commercial herds in which the crossbred (CB) descendants of these nucleus animals are expected to perform. This approach assumes that PB animals selected in the nucleus herd will have CB progeny that have superior performance at the commercial level. There is clear evidence that this may not be the case for all traits of economic importance and, thus, including data collected at the commercial herd level may increase the accuracy of selection for commercial CB performance at the nucleus level. The goal for this study was to estimate genetic parameters for five maternal reproductive traits between two PB maternal nucleus populations (Landrace and Yorkshire) and their CB offspring: Total Number Born (TNB), Number Born Alive (NBA), Number Born Alive > 1 kg (NBA > 1 kg), Total Number Weaned (TNW), and Litter Weight at Weaning (LWW). Estimates were based on single-step GBLUP by analyzing any two combinations of a PB and the CB population, and by analyzing all three populations jointly. The genomic relationship matrix between the three populations was generated by using within-population allele frequencies for relationships within a population, and across-population allele frequencies for relationships of the CB with the PB animals. Utilization of metafounders for the two PB populations had no effect on parameter estimates, so the two PB populations were assumed to be genetically unrelated. Joint analysis of two (one PB plus CB) vs. three (both PB and CB) populations did not impact estimates of heritability, additive genetic variance, and genetic correlations. Heritabilities were generally similar between the PB and CB populations, except for LWW and TNW, for which PB populations had about four times larger estimates than CB. Purebred-crossbred genetic correlations (rpc) were larger for Landrace than for Yorkshire, except for NBA > 1 kg. These estimates of rpc indicate that there is potential to improve selection of PB animals for CB performance by including CB information for all traits in the Yorkshire population, but that noticeable additional gains may only occur for NBA > 1 kg and TNW in the Landrace population.

Indexed as

GenomeReproductionAnimalsGenomicsModels, GeneticPhenotypeSwineWeaninggenetic parameterspurebred-crossbred correlationreproductive traitsswine

Identifiers

PMID34558614
PMCPMC8557628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.